Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34299924›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Roles of the Maternal and Child Health Handbook and Other Home-Based Records on Newborn and Child Health: A Systematic Review.

Rogie Royce Carandang, Jennifer Lisa Sakamoto, Mika Kondo Kunieda, Akira Shibanuma, Ekaterina Yarotskaya, Milana Basargina, Masamine Jimba

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rogie Royce CarandangDepartment of Community and Global Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6668-911X
Jennifer Lisa SakamotoDepartment of Community and Global Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3444-1851
Mika Kondo KuniedaDepartment of Community and Global Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3412-9860
Akira ShibanumaDepartment of Community and Global Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2058-1722
Ekaterina YarotskayaNational Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 117-997 Moscow, Russia.
Milana BasarginaDepartment of Neonatal Pathology, National Medical Research Center for Children's Health, 119-991 Moscow, Russia.
Masamine JimbaDepartment of Community and Global Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5659-3237

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Home-based records are paper or electronic records retained and used by mothers or caregivers to document the health services received for maternal, newborn, and child health. Little has been studied about the roles of these records on newborn and child health outcomes. Hence, we collated and summarized evidence concerning the roles of home-based records in improving newborn and child health. We conducted a systematic search in several databases: MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Academic Search Complete, SocINDEX, CENTRAL, DARE, NHS EED, HTA, J-STAGE, Ichushi, and gray literature. We included original research articles of all study designs published in English or Japanese until January 2020. Owing to heterogeneity across the outcomes of included studies, we conducted a narrative synthesis. We included 55 studies (23 in Japanese) among 14,017 identified articles. We identified the following roles of home-based records on newborn and child health: promoted newborn/childcare seeking, improved knowledge and practices of newborn/childcare, encouraged home care for childhood illnesses, reduced child mortality and morbidity, and facilitated continuum of care. We observed a mixed effect on age-appropriate immunization (e.g., DTP3 completion) and no effect on the practice of immediate breastfeeding and prevention of perinatal mortality and morbidity. The findings highlighted the effectiveness and usefulness of home-based records to improve newborn and child health outcomes. However, only a few studies were available for each outcome category, limiting the certainty of evidence provided in this review. Therefore, we recommend further studies to explore the benefits of home-based records on improving newborn and child health.

Indexed as

Child HealthChild Health ServicesBreast FeedingCaregiversChildChild MortalityFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancychild healthhome-based recordsMCH handbooknewborn healthsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34299924
PMCPMC8306696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.