Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34299826›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

A Service Evaluation of the Military HeadFIT Initiative: An Implementation Study.

Amber McKenzie, Bethany Croak, Laura Rafferty, Neil Greenberg, Sharon A M Stevelink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amber McKenzieKing's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London, London SE5 9RJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1423-4169
Bethany CroakKing's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London, London SE5 9RJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6486-8154
Laura RaffertyKing's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London, London SE5 9RJ, UK.
Neil GreenbergKing's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London, London SE5 9RJ, UK.
Sharon A M StevelinkKing's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London, London SE5 9RJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7655-7986

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: UK Armed Forces personnel provide first response, support and protection during national and international disasters and conflicts. They thus have a psychologically challenging role which requires them to maintain a good state of mental health and wellbeing. HeadFIT is a preventative initiative developed to help foster mental fitness through various self-help tools and resources online including techniques to de-stress and increase drive. This paper reports on an independent service evaluation of HeadFIT to examine feasibility and acceptability among Ministry of Defence (MOD) personnel. (2) Methods: Qualitative interviews were held with the HeadFIT beneficiaries, including military personnel and civil servants. The beneficiaries provided feedback on HeadFIT through questionnaires and interviews, and website traffic data were also collected. Qualitative data were analysed using framework analysis. (3) Results: Beneficiaries generally reported positive views on the HeadFIT initiative, with most agreeing that the tools could support them to foster their mental fitness. However, concerns were raised around the uptake of HeadFIT and participants suggested methods to improve usability. (4) Conclusions: Several recommendations were made to improve the resources, usability, uptake, and implementation and communication of HeadFIT.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesMilitary PersonnelDriveHumansMental HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomCivil ServiceDefenceHeadFITinitiativemental fitnessmental healthmilitaryservice evaluationwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID34299826
PMCPMC8305612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.