Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34299697›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

A Multicentre, Randomised, Controlled Trial of a Combined Clinical Treatment for First-Episode Psychosis.

Itxaso González-Ortega, Patricia Vega, Enrique Echeburúa, Susana Alberich, Jessica Fernández-Sevillano, Sara Barbeito, Vicent Balanzá-Martínez, Eduard Vieta, Esther Lorente-Rovira, Ana Luengo and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Itxaso González-OrtegaCentre for Biomedical Research in the Mental Health Network (CIBERSAM), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Patricia VegaCentre for Biomedical Research in the Mental Health Network (CIBERSAM), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Enrique EcheburúaCentre for Biomedical Research in the Mental Health Network (CIBERSAM), 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7654-0781
Susana AlberichCentre for Biomedical Research in the Mental Health Network (CIBERSAM), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Jessica Fernández-SevillanoCentre for Biomedical Research in the Mental Health Network (CIBERSAM), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Sara BarbeitoCentre for Biomedical Research in the Mental Health Network (CIBERSAM), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Vicent Balanzá-MartínezCentre for Biomedical Research in the Mental Health Network (CIBERSAM), 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7772-7396
Eduard VietaCentre for Biomedical Research in the Mental Health Network (CIBERSAM), 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0548-0053
Esther Lorente-RoviraCentre for Biomedical Research in the Mental Health Network (CIBERSAM), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Ana LuengoDepartment of Psychiatry, Clinic University Hospital of Valencia, INCLIVA, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7905-601X
Ester CerrilloDepartment of Psychiatry, Bellvitge University Hospital, IDIBELL, 08907 Barcelona, Spain.
José Manuel CrespoCentre for Biomedical Research in the Mental Health Network (CIBERSAM), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Carlos MatuteAchucarro Basque Centre for Neurosciences, University of the Basque Country, 48940 Leioa, Spain.
Ana González-PintoCentre for Biomedical Research in the Mental Health Network (CIBERSAM), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
University of the Basque Country · ESBellvitge University Hospital · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental · ESINCLIVA Health Research Institute · ESUniversidad de La Rioja · ESUniversidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia · ESUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is evidence that early intervention contributes to improving the prognosis and course of first-episode psychosis (FEP). However, further randomised treatment clinical trials are needed.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a combined clinical treatment involving Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) as an adjunctive to treatment-as-usual (TAU) (CBT+TAU) versus TAU alone for FEP. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial, 177 participants were randomly allocated to either CBT+TAU or TAU. The primary outcome was post-treatment patient functioning.

resultsThe CBT+TAU group showed a greater improvement in functioning, which was measured using the Global Assessment Functioning (GAF) and Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST), compared to the TAU group post-treatment. The CBT+TAU participants exhibited a greater decline in depressive, negative, and general psychotic symptoms; a better awareness of the disease and treatment adherence; and a greater increase in brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels than TAU participants.

conclusionsEarly intervention based on a combined clinical treatment involving CBT as an adjunctive to standard treatment may improve clinical and functional outcomes in FEP.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyPsychotic DisordersCombined Modality TherapyHumansSingle-Blind MethodTreatment Adherence and ComplianceTreatment Outcomeearly interventionfirst-episode psychosisoutcomerandomised controlled trialtreatment

Identifiers

PMID34299697
PMCPMC8304114
OpenAlexW3181725617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.