Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34299684›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

The Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ) and the Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ): Translation and Cognitive Debriefing of the Arabic Version.

Sinaa A Al-Aqeel, Shiekha S AlAujan, Saja H Almazrou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Heart failure: a prevalence-based and model-based cost analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sinaa A Al-AqeelClinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 14511, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0571-7230
Shiekha S AlAujanClinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 14511, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1973-6870
Saja H AlmazrouClinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 14511, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9307-2913

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to translate the Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ) and the Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ) from English into Arabic and perform cognitive debriefing in a Saudi Arabian setting. We conducted the translation according to guidelines, including two independent forward translations and a backward translation. Cognitive debriefing was carried out in two stages. First, the pre-final translated versions of the two questionnaires were tested on a group of respondents (

Indexed as

Technology Assessment, BiomedicalTranslationsCognitionHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSaudi ArabiaSurveys and Questionnairescosts and cost analysissurveys and questionnairestranslating

Identifiers

PMID34299684
PMCPMC8303958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.