Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34299263›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Focused Ion Microbeam Irradiation Induces Clustering of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Heterochromatin Visualized by Nanoscale-Resolution Electron Microscopy.

Yvonne Lorat, Judith Reindl, Anna Isermann, Christian Rübe, Anna A Friedl, Claudia E Rübe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Cellular Response to Complex DNA Damage Induced by Ionising Radiation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yvonne LoratDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Hospital, 66421 Homburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2759-3112
Judith ReindlInstitute for Applied Physic and Metrology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, 85577 Neubiberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3238-8586
Anna IsermannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Hospital, 66421 Homburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9931-8286
Christian RübeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Hospital, 66421 Homburg, Germany.
Anna A FriedlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian University, 80539 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7425-6151
Claudia E RübeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Hospital, 66421 Homburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3882-7903
Saarland University · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversität der Bundeswehr München · DE

Funding

Deutsche Krebshilfe 70112268German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF) 02NUK035A & 02NUK058B.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCharged-particle radiotherapy is an emerging treatment modality for radioresistant tumors. The enhanced effectiveness of high-energy particles (such as heavy ions) has been related to the spatial clustering of DNA lesions due to highly localized energy deposition. Here, DNA damage patterns induced by single and multiple carbon ions were analyzed in the nuclear chromatin environment by different high-resolution microscopy approaches. MATERIAL AND

methodsUsing the heavy-ion microbeam SNAKE, fibroblast monolayers were irradiated with defined numbers of carbon ions (1/10/100 ions per pulse, ipp) focused to micrometer-sized stripes or spots. Radiation-induced lesions were visualized as DNA damage foci (γH2AX, 53BP1) by conventional fluorescence and stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy. At micro- and nanoscale level, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) were visualized within their chromatin context by labeling the Ku heterodimer. Single and clustered pKu70-labeled DSBs were quantified in euchromatic and heterochromatic regions at 0.1 h, 5 h and 24 h post-IR by transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

resultsIncreasing numbers of carbon ions per beam spot enhanced spatial clustering of DNA lesions and increased damage complexity with two or more DSBs in close proximity. This effect was detectable in euchromatin, but was much more pronounced in heterochromatin. Analyzing the dynamics of damage processing, our findings indicate that euchromatic DSBs were processed efficiently and repaired in a timely manner. In heterochromatin, by contrast, the number of clustered DSBs continuously increased further over the first hours following IR exposure, indicating the challenging task for the cell to process highly clustered DSBs appropriately.

conclusionIncreasing numbers of carbon ions applied to sub-nuclear chromatin regions enhanced the spatial clustering of DSBs and increased damage complexity, this being more pronounced in heterochromatic regions. Inefficient processing of clustered DSBs may explain the enhanced therapeutic efficacy of particle-based radiotherapy in cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesCluster AnalysisDNADNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA DamageDNA RepairEuchromatinFibroblastsHeavy Ion RadiotherapyHeavy IonsHeterochromatinHumansKu AutoantigenLinear Energy TransferMicroscopy, ElectronRadiation, IonizingDNAEuchromatinHeterochromatinKu Autoantigencarbon ionscharged-particle radiotherapyDNA double-strand breaks (DSBs)microbeam irradiationnon-homologous end joining (NHEJ)transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

Identifiers

PMID34299263
PMCPMC8306362
OpenAlexW3184895098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.