Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34298988›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Biocompatibility and Biological Performance Evaluation of Additive-Manufactured Bioabsorbable Iron-Based Porous Suture Anchor in a Rabbit Model.

Chien-Cheng Tai, Hon-Lok Lo, Chen-Kun Liaw, Yu-Min Huang, Yen-Hua Huang, Kuo-Yi Yang, Chih-Chieh Huang, Shin-I Huang, Hsin-Hsin Shen, Tzu-Hung Lin and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Three-Dimensional Printing in Pediatric Orthopaedics: Cost Analysis and Emerging Applications.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Chien-Cheng TaiInternal Ph.D. Program for Cell Therapy and Regeneration Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Hon-Lok LoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Chen-Kun LiawDepartment of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Yu-Min HuangDepartment of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7059-4498
Yen-Hua HuangInternal Ph.D. Program for Cell Therapy and Regeneration Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6020-9998
Kuo-Yi YangBiomedical Technology and Device Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Chutung, Hsinchu 310401, Taiwan.
Chih-Chieh HuangBiomedical Technology and Device Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Chutung, Hsinchu 310401, Taiwan.
Shin-I HuangBiomedical Technology and Device Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Chutung, Hsinchu 310401, Taiwan.
Hsin-Hsin ShenBiomedical Technology and Device Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Chutung, Hsinchu 310401, Taiwan.
Tzu-Hung LinMaterial and Chemical Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu 31040, Taiwan.
Chun-Kuan LuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Park One International Hospital, Kaohsiung 813322, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9738-6151
Wen-Chih LiuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7689-8732
Jui-Sheng SunDepartment of Orthopedics, China Medical University, Taichung 40202, Taiwan.
Pei-I TsaiBiomedical Technology and Device Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Chutung, Hsinchu 310401, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3516-3120
Chih-Yu ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5508-7647
Industrial Technology Research Institute · TWTaipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TWKaohsiung Medical University · TWChina Medical University · TWTaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital; Industrial Technology Research Institute 201956F0020; J356EX3200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the biocompatibility and biological performance of novel additive-manufactured bioabsorbable iron-based porous suture anchors (iron_SAs). Two types of bioabsorbable iron_SAs, with double- and triple-helical structures (iron_SA_2_helix and iron_SA_3_helix, respectively), were compared with the synthetic polymer-based bioabsorbable suture anchor (polymer_SAs). An in vitro mechanical test, MTT assay, and scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis were performed. An in vivo animal study was also performed. The three types of suture anchors were randomly implanted in the outer cortex of the lateral femoral condyle. The ultimate in vitro pullout strength of the iron_SA_3_helix group was significantly higher than the iron_SA_2_helix and polymer_SA groups. The MTT assay findings demonstrated no significant cytotoxicity, and the SEM analysis showed cells attachment on implant surface. The ultimate failure load of the iron_SA_3_helix group was significantly higher than that of the polymer_SA group. The micro-CT analysis indicated the iron_SA_3_helix group showed a higher bone volume fraction (BV/TV) after surgery. Moreover, both iron SAs underwent degradation with time. Iron_SAs with triple-helical threads and a porous structure demonstrated better mechanical strength and high biocompatibility after short-term implantation. The combined advantages of the mechanical superiority of the iron metal and the possibility of absorption after implantation make the iron_SA a suitable candidate for further development.

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsBiocompatible MaterialsSuture AnchorsAlanine TransaminaseAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBlood Urea NitrogenCalcium PhosphatesCalcium SulfateCreatinineEquipment DesignFemurIronLasersMaterials TestingMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningAlanine Transaminasebeta-tricalcium phosphateBiocompatible MaterialsCalcium PhosphatesCalcium SulfateCreatinineIronPolymersadditive manufacturing (3D printing)bioabsorbableiron-basedsuture anchor

Identifiers

PMID34298988
PMCPMC8307211
OpenAlexW3177979473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.