Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34298857›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Development of a Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Prognostic Score (MUMPS) for Use in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Deirdre Kelly, April A N Rose, Thiago Pimentel Muniz, David Hogg, Marcus O Butler, Samuel D Saibil, Ian King, Zaid Saeed Kamil, Danny Ghazarian, Kendra Ross and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Uveal Melanoma: Changing Paradigms of Treatment.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Deirdre KellyPrincess Margaret Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G1Z5, Canada.
April A N RosePrincess Margaret Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G1Z5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9845-4603
Thiago Pimentel MunizPrincess Margaret Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G1Z5, Canada.
David HoggPrincess Margaret Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G1Z5, Canada.
Marcus O ButlerPrincess Margaret Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G1Z5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9840-7057
Samuel D SaibilPrincess Margaret Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G1Z5, Canada.
Ian KingDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G1Z5, Canada.
Zaid Saeed KamilDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G1Z5, Canada.
Danny GhazarianDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G1Z5, Canada.
Kendra RossPrincess Margaret Cancer Center, Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Toronto, ON M5G1Z5, Canada.
Marco IafollaPrincess Margaret Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G1Z5, Canada.
Daniel V AraujoPrincess Margaret Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G1Z5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7013-5408
John WaldronPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G1Z5, Canada.
Normand LaperrierePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G1Z5, Canada.
Hatem KremaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Ocular Oncology Service Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G2C1, Canada.
Anna SpreaficoPrincess Margaret Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G1Z5, Canada.
University Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) is a rare disease. There are limited data on prognostic clinical factors for overall survival (OS) in patients with mUM treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Retrospective and non-randomized prospective studies have reported response rates of 0-17% for anti-PD1/L1 ± anti-CTLA4 ICI in mUM, indicating a potential benefit only in a subset of patients. This study evaluates the characteristics associated with ICI benefit in patients with mUM. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with mUM who received anti-PD1/L1 ± anti-CTLA4 ICI between 2014-2019. Clinical and genomic characteristics were collected from a chart review. Treatment response and clinical progression were determined by physician assessment. Multivariable Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier log-rank tests were used to assess differences in clinical progression-free survival (cPFS) and OS between groups and identify clinical variables associated with ICI outcomes. We identified 71 mUM patients who received 75 lines of ICI therapy. Of these, 54 received anti-PD1/L1 alone, and 21 received anti-PD1/L1 + anti-CTLA4. Patient characteristics were: 53% female, 48% were 65 or older, 72% received one or fewer lines of prior therapy. Within our cohort, 53% of patients had developed metastatic disease <2 years after their initial diagnosis. Bone metastases were present in 12% of patients. The median cPFS was 2.7 months, and the median OS was 10.0 months. In multivariable analyses for both cPFS and OS, the following variables were associated with a good prognosis: ≥2 years from the initial diagnosis to metastatic disease (

Indexed as

CTLA4immune checkpoint inhibitorimmunotherapyPD1predictive scoreprognosticuveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID34298857
PMCPMC8306971
OpenAlexW3185936390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.