Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34298733›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Assessment and Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Imaging Modalities and Future Perspectives.

Valeria Romeo, Giuseppe Accardo, Teresa Perillo, Luca Basso, Nunzia Garbino, Emanuele Nicolai, Simone Maurea, Marco Salvatore

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prospective comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Valeria RomeoDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe AccardoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (IRCCS-CROB), Rionero in Vulture, 85028 Potenza, Italy.
Teresa PerilloDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Luca BassoIRCCS SDN, 80143 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1774-0924
Nunzia GarbinoIRCCS SDN, 80143 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6863-7313
Emanuele NicolaiIRCCS SDN, 80143 Naples, Italy.
Simone MaureaDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Marco SalvatoreIRCCS SDN, 80143 Naples, Italy.
SDN Istituto di Ricerca Diagnostica e Nucleare · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITCentro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is becoming the standard of care for locally advanced breast cancer, aiming to reduce tumor size before surgery. Unfortunately, less than 30% of patients generally achieve a pathological complete response and approximately 5% of patients show disease progression while receiving NAC. Accurate assessment of the response to NAC is crucial for subsequent surgical planning. Furthermore, early prediction of tumor response could avoid patients being overtreated with useless chemotherapy sections, which are not free from side effects and psychological implications. In this review, we first analyze and compare the accuracy of conventional and advanced imaging techniques as well as discuss the application of artificial intelligence tools in the assessment of tumor response after NAC. Thereafter, the role of advanced imaging techniques, such as MRI, nuclear medicine, and new hybrid PET/MRI imaging in the prediction of the response to NAC is described in the second part of the review. Finally, future perspectives in NAC response prediction, represented by AI applications, are discussed.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebreast cancerimagingmachine learningneoadjuvant chemotherapynuclear medicineradiomics

Identifiers

PMID34298733
PMCPMC8303777
OpenAlexW3182569057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.