Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34298717›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

The PATHFINDER Study: Assessment of the Implementation of an Investigational Multi-Cancer Early Detection Test into Clinical Practice.

Lincoln D Nadauld, Charles H McDonnell, Tomasz M Beer, Minetta C Liu, Eric A Klein, Andrew Hudnut, Richard A Whittington, Bruce Taylor, Geoffrey R Oxnard, Jafi Lipson and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04241796 (The PATHFINDER Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04241796 nacompletednot on this map

The PATHFINDER Study: Assessment of the Implementation of an Investigational Multi-Cancer Early Detection Test Into Clinical Practice

TypeinterventionalSponsorGRAIL, Inc.Ran2019 to 2022Enrolled6,662ConditionsCancerArmsMulti-Cancer Early Detection Test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Socio-ecological Analysis of Factors Influencing the Perceived Value of Multicancer Early Detection Testing in the United States.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Challenges of early detection of pancreatic cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Updates on lung cancer screening for early detection.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2025
    Review
  18. Ethical Considerations and Implications of Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening: Reliability, Access and Cost to Test and Treat.Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Lincoln D NadauldHematology/Oncology, Intermountain Healthcare, St. George, UT 84790, USA.
Charles H McDonnellSutter Health, Sacramento, CA 95816, USA.
Tomasz M BeerHematology/Medical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Minetta C LiuDepartments of Oncology and Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Eric A KleinGlickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Andrew HudnutSutter Health, Sacramento, CA 95816, USA.
Richard A WhittingtonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT 84111, USA.
Bruce TaylorDepartment of Internal Medicine, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT 84111, USA.
Geoffrey R OxnardDepartment of Medical Oncology, Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Jafi LipsonRadiology Department, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4671-5813
Margarita LopatinGRAIL, Inc., Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Rita ShaknovichGRAIL, Inc., Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Karen C ChungGRAIL, Inc., Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4170-8390
Eric T FungGRAIL, Inc., Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Deborah SchragDepartment of Medical Oncology, Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Catherine R MarinacDepartment of Medical Oncology, Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9128-3012
Menlo School · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USIntermountain Healthcare · USSutter Health · USCleveland Clinic · USMayo Clinic · USOregon Health & Science University · USStanford Health Care · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To examine the extent of the evaluation required to achieve diagnostic resolution and the test performance characteristics of a targeted methylation cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test, ~6200 participants ≥50 years with (cohort A) or without (cohort B) ≥1 of 3 additional specific cancer risk factors will be enrolled in PATHFINDER (NCT04241796), a prospective, longitudinal, interventional, multi-center study. Plasma cfDNA from blood samples will be analyzed to detect abnormally methylated DNA associated with cancer (i.e., cancer "signal") and a cancer signal origin (i.e., tissue of origin). Participants with a "signal detected" will undergo further diagnostic evaluation per guiding physician discretion; those with a "signal not detected" will be advised to continue guideline-recommended screening. The primary objective will be to assess the number and types of subsequent diagnostic tests needed for diagnostic resolution. Based on microsimulations (using estimates of cancer incidence and dwell times) of the typical risk profiles of anticipated participants, the median (95% CI) number of participants with a "signal detected" result is expected to be 106 (87-128). Subsequent diagnostic evaluation is expected to detect 52 (39-67) cancers. The positive predictive value of the MCED test is expected to be 49% (39-58%). PATHFINDER will evaluate the integration of a cfDNA-based MCED test into existing clinical cancer diagnostic pathways. The study design of PATHFINDER is described here.

Indexed as

cancerdiagnostic pathwaysmethylation cell-free DNAmulti-cancer early detection test

Identifiers

PMID34298717
PMCPMC8304888
OpenAlexW3177834994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.