Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34298704›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

BC-Monitor: Towards a Routinely Accessible Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Tool for Real-Time Monitoring Breast Cancer Progression and Treatment Effectiveness.

Katalin Priskin, Sára Pólya, Lajos Pintér, Gábor Jaksa, Bernadett Csányi, Márton Zsolt Enyedi, Eszter Sági-Zsigmond, Farkas Sükösd, Orsolya Oláh-Németh, Gyöngyi Kelemen and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katalin PriskinDelta Bio 2000 Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Sára PólyaVisal Plus Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Lajos PintérDelta Bio 2000 Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Gábor JaksaDelta Bio 2000 Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Bernadett CsányiVisal Plus Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Márton Zsolt EnyediDelta Bio 2000 Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Eszter Sági-ZsigmondDelta Bio 2000 Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Farkas SükösdDepartment of Pathology, University of Szeged, 6701 Szeged, Hungary.
Orsolya Oláh-NémethDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Gyöngyi KelemenDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Alíz NikolényiDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Gabriella UhercsákDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Dóra SánthaDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Ágnes DobiDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Éva SzilágyiDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Erzsébet ValicsekDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
László TordaiDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Rozália TóthDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Zsuzsanna KahánDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Lajos HaracskaHCEMM-BRC Mutagenesis and Carcinogenesis Research Group, Institute of Genetics, Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
University of Szeged · HUHUN-REN Szegedi Biológiai Kutatóközpont · HU

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme 739593National Research, Development and Innovation Office GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00001, GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00024, and GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly employed in the screening, follow-up, and monitoring of the continuously evolving tumor; however, most ctDNA assays validated for clinical use cannot maintain the right balance between sensitivity, coverage, sample requirements, time, and cost. Here, we report our BC-monitor, a simple, well-balanced ctDNA diagnostic approach using a gene panel significant in breast cancer and an optimized multiplex PCR-based NGS protocol capable of identifying allele variant frequencies below 1% in cell-free plasma DNA. We monitored a cohort of 45 breast cancer patients prospectively enrolled into our study receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy or palliative therapy for metastatic diseases. Their tumor mutation status was examined in the archived tumor samples and plasma samples collected before and continuously during therapy. Traceable mutations of the used 38-plex NGS assay were found in approximately two-thirds of the patients. Importantly, we detected new pathogenic variants in follow-up plasma samples that were not detected in the primary tumor and baseline plasma samples. We proved that the BC-monitor can pre-indicate disease progression four-six months earlier than conventional methods. Our study highlights the need for well-designed ctDNA monitoring during treatment and follow-up, integrated into a real-time treatment assessment, which could provide information on the active tumor DNA released into the blood.

Indexed as

breast cancerctDNA treatment responseliquid biopsynext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34298704
PMCPMC8305126
OpenAlexW3181433003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.