Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34298675›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Assessment of Circulating Nucleic Acids in Cancer: From Current Status to Future Perspectives and Potential Clinical Applications.

Gabriella Cirmena, Martina Dameri, Francesco Ravera, Piero Fregatti, Alberto Ballestrero, Gabriele Zoppoli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Cell-Free DNA in Dermatology Research.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Role of Cell-Free DNA and Deoxyribonucleases in Tumor Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Pancreatic cancer in 2021: What you need to know to win.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriella CirmenaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Martina DameriDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Francesco RaveraDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Piero FregattiU.O.C. Clinica di Chirurgia Senologica, Department of Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Alberto BallestreroDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Gabriele ZoppoliDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1619-1708
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current approaches for cancer detection and characterization are based on radiological procedures coupled with tissue biopsies, despite relevant limitations in terms of overall accuracy and feasibility, including relevant patients' discomfort. Liquid biopsies enable the minimally invasive collection and analysis of circulating biomarkers released from cancer cells and stroma, representing therefore a promising candidate for the substitution or integration in the current standard of care. Despite the potential, the current clinical applications of liquid biopsies are limited to a few specific purposes. The lack of standardized procedures for the pre-analytical management of body fluids samples and the detection of circulating biomarkers is one of the main factors impacting the effective advancement in the applicability of liquid biopsies to clinical practice. The aim of this work, besides depicting current methods for samples collection, storage, quality check and biomarker extraction, is to review the current techniques aimed at analyzing one of the main circulating biomarkers assessed through liquid biopsy, namely cell-free nucleic acids, with particular regard to circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). ctDNA current and potential applications are reviewed as well.

Indexed as

biomarkerscell-free DNAcirculating tumor DNAliquid biopsyprecision oncology

Identifiers

PMID34298675
PMCPMC8307284
OpenAlexW3177783887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.