Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34298671›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Quality of Automated Stereotactic Radiosurgery Plans in Patients with 4 to 10 Brain Metastases.

Anna Petoukhova, Roland Snijder, Rudolf Wiggenraad, Linda de Boer-de Wit, Ivonne Mudde-van der Wouden, Mireille Florijn, Jaap Zindler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna PetoukhovaDepartment of Medical Physics, Haaglanden Medical Center, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands.
Roland SnijderDepartment of Medical Physics, Haaglanden Medical Center, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands.
Rudolf WiggenraadDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Center, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands.
Linda de Boer-de WitDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Center, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands.
Ivonne Mudde-van der WoudenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Center, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands.
Mireille FlorijnDepartment of Medical Physics, Haaglanden Medical Center, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands.
Jaap ZindlerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Center, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands.
Medisch Centrum Haaglanden · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose was to compare linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery and hypofractionated radiotherapy plan quality of automated planning, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and manual dynamic conformal arc (DCA) plans as well as single- and multiple-isocenter techniques for multiple brain metastases (BM). For twelve patients with four to ten BM, seven non-coplanar linac-based plans were created: a manually planned DCA plan with a separate isocenter for each metastasis, a single-isocenter dynamic IMRT plan, an automatically generated single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) plan, four automatically generated single-isocenter DCA plans with three or five couch angles, with high or low sparing of normal tissue. Paddick conformity index, gradient index (GI), mean dose, total V

Indexed as

automated planningDCAIMRTlinac-based stereotactic radiosurgery or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapymultiple brain metastasessingle isocenterVMAT

Identifiers

PMID34298671
PMCPMC8307043
OpenAlexW3182022475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.