Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34298668›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Explainable Artificial Intelligence Reveals Novel Insight into Tumor Microenvironment Conditions Linked with Better Prognosis in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Debaditya Chakraborty, Cristina Ivan, Paola Amero, Maliha Khan, Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo, Hakan Başağaoğlu, Gabriel Lopez-Berestein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Debaditya ChakrabortyDepartment of Construction Science, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.
Cristina IvanDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4848-0168
Paola AmeroDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7503-0381
Maliha KhanDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Cristian Rodriguez-AguayoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7880-7723
Hakan BaşağaoğluEvolution Online LLC, San Antonio, TX 78260, USA.
Gabriel Lopez-BeresteinDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the data-driven relationship between immune cell composition in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and the ≥5-year survival rates of breast cancer patients using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) models. We acquired TCGA breast invasive carcinoma data from the cbioPortal and retrieved immune cell composition estimates from bulk RNA sequencing data from TIMER2.0 based on EPIC, CIBERSORT, TIMER, and xCell computational methods. Novel insights derived from our XAI model showed that B cells, CD8

Indexed as

breast cancerexplainable artificial intelligence (XAI)machine learningsurvival analysistumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID34298668
PMCPMC8303703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.