Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34298632›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Intersection of Two Checkpoints: Could Inhibiting the DNA Damage Response Checkpoint Rescue Immune Checkpoint-Refractory Cancer?

Peter H Goff, Rashmi Bhakuni, Thomas Pulliam, Jung Hyun Lee, Evan T Hall, Paul Nghiem

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Insights into anti-tumor immunityFrontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  7. Therapeutic Targeting of DNA Damage Response in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter H GoffDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3488-4997
Rashmi BhakuniDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0450-3735
Thomas PulliamDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Jung Hyun LeeDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Evan T HallDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Paul NghiemDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2784-963X
University of Washington · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

Understand & overcome resistance to PD-1P01CA225517 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Cecilia C Yeung · 2019 to 2026
$22.7M
Mark Foundation For Cancer Research 20-002-ASPNCI NIH HHS P01 CA225517NCI NIH HHS P01-CA22551 & R01-AR-067722Prostate Cancer Foundation PCF# 19CHAS02RSNA Research and Education Foundation RR2028University of Washington MCC Gift Fund N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic cancers resistant to immunotherapy require novel management strategies. DNA damage response (DDR) proteins, including ATR (ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related), ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated) and DNA-PK (DNA-dependent protein kinase), have been promising therapeutic targets for decades. Specific, potent DDR inhibitors (DDRi) recently entered clinical trials. Surprisingly, preclinical studies have now indicated that DDRi may stimulate anti-tumor immunity to augment immunotherapy. The mechanisms governing how DDRi could promote anti-tumor immunity are not well understood; however, early evidence suggests that they can potentiate immunogenic cell death to recruit and activate antigen-presenting cells to prime an adaptive immune response. Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is well suited to test these concepts. It is inherently immunogenic as ~50% of patients with advanced MCC persistently benefit from immunotherapy, making MCC one of the most responsive solid tumors. As is typical of neuroendocrine cancers, dysfunction of p53 and Rb with upregulation of Myc leads to the very rapid growth of MCC. This suggests high replication stress and susceptibility to DDRi and DNA-damaging agents. Indeed, MCC tumors are particularly radiosensitive. Given its inherent immunogenicity, cell cycle checkpoint deficiencies and sensitivity to DNA damage, MCC may be ideal for testing whether targeting the intersection of the DDR checkpoint and the immune checkpoint could help patients with immunotherapy-refractory cancers.

Indexed as

ATMATRcell cycle checkpointDNA damage response inhibitorsDNA-PKimmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmunogenic cell deathMerkel cell carcinomaPD-1 pathway

Identifiers

PMID34298632
PMCPMC8307089
OpenAlexW3180437232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.