Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34298611›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Genomic Analysis of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Fereshteh Izadi, Benjamin P Sharpe, Stella P Breininger, Maria Secrier, Jane Gibson, Robert C Walker, Saqib Rahman, Ginny Devonshire, Megan A Lloyd, Zoë S Walters and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fereshteh IzadiSchool of Cancer Sciences, Cancer Research UK Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Benjamin P SharpeSchool of Cancer Sciences, Cancer Research UK Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7594-1601
Stella P BreiningerSchool of Cancer Sciences, Cancer Research UK Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Maria SecrierUCL Genetics Institute, Division of Biosciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2758-1741
Jane GibsonSchool of Cancer Sciences, Cancer Research UK Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0973-8285
Robert C WalkerSchool of Cancer Sciences, Cancer Research UK Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2101-1318
Saqib RahmanSchool of Cancer Sciences, Cancer Research UK Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9489-0021
Ginny DevonshireCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.
Megan A LloydSchool of Cancer Sciences, Cancer Research UK Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Zoë S WaltersSchool of Cancer Sciences, Cancer Research UK Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1835-5868
Rebecca C FitzgeraldMRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 OXZ, UK.
Matthew J J Rose-ZerilliSchool of Cancer Sciences, Cancer Research UK Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Tim J UnderwoodSchool of Cancer Sciences, Cancer Research UK Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9455-2188
On Behalf Of Occams
Cancer Research UK · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 23924Cancer Research UK A23924Cancer Research UK RG66287Cancer Research UK RG81771/84119Medical Research Council RG84369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery is the standard of care for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Unfortunately, response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is poor (20-37%), as is the overall survival benefit at five years (9%). The EAC genome is complex and heterogeneous between patients, and it is not yet understood whether specific mutational patterns may result in chemotherapy sensitivity or resistance. To identify associations between genomic events and response to NAC in EAC, a comparative genomic analysis was performed in 65 patients with extensive clinical and pathological annotation using whole-genome sequencing (WGS). We defined response using Mandard Tumor Regression Grade (TRG), with responders classified as TRG1-2 (

Indexed as

chemotherapyesophageal adenocarcinomagenomicsmutationNAV3response

Identifiers

PMID34298611
PMCPMC8308111
OpenAlexW3181303517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.