Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34298359›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2021

SARS-CoV-2 detection in wastewater using multiplex quantitative PCR.

Anna Navarro, Livia Gómez, Isabella Sanseverino, Magdalena Niegowska, Eszter Roka, Rosalba Pedraccini, Marta Vargha, Teresa Lettieri

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. COVID-19 and Water Variables: Review and Scientometric Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Diagnostic Tools Applied for Assessing Microbial Water Quality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna NavarroEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre, Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, VA, Italy.
Livia GómezEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre, Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, VA, Italy.
Isabella SanseverinoEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre, Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, VA, Italy.
Magdalena NiegowskaEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre, Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, VA, Italy.
Eszter RokaDepartment of Public Health Laboratory, National Public Health Centre, Albert Flórián út 2-6, 1097 Budapest, Hungary.
Rosalba PedracciniAlfa S.r.l., via Carrobbio, 3, 21100 Varese, Italy.
Marta VarghaDepartment of Public Health Laboratory, National Public Health Centre, Albert Flórián út 2-6, 1097 Budapest, Hungary.
Teresa LettieriEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre, Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, VA, Italy. Electronic address: teresa.lettieri@ec.europa.eu.
Joint Research Centre · ITNational Public Health and Medical Officer Service · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multiplex reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)-based method was designed for the simultaneous detection of different SARS-CoV-2 genes. In this study, we used three target genes encoding for the nucleocapsid 1 and 3 (N1, N3), and the spike (S) proteins, all commonly used in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in human and environmental samples. The performance of the multiplex assay, compared to the single assay was assessed for the standard calibration curve, required for absolute quantification, and then, for the real environmental samples to detect SARS-CoV-2. For this latter, four environmental samples were collected at a local wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). The results showed that the cycle threshold (Ct) values of the multiplex were comparable to the values obtained by the singleplex PCR. The amplification of the three target genes indicated the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the four water samples with an increasing trend in February and these results were confirmed in the multiplex approach, showing the robustness of this method and its applicability for the relative abundance analysis among the samples. Overall, both the laboratory and field work results demonstrated that the multiplex PCR assay developed in this study could provide a method for SARS-CoV-2 detection as robust as the single qPCR, but faster and cost-effective, reducing by three times the number of reactions, and consequently the handling time and reagents.

Indexed as

COVID-19Multiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionHumansReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityWastewaterWastewaterEnvironmental surveillanceMultiplex assayRT-qPCRSARS-CoV-2Wastewater

Identifiers

PMID34298359
PMCPMC8278834
OpenAlexW3186922720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.