Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34298081›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2021

Frontoparietal pattern similarity analyses of cognitive control in monozygotic twins.

Rongxiang Tang, Joset A Etzel, Alexander Kizhner, Todd S Braver

Open access · goldAbstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive Control Project.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rongxiang TangDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1125, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130, USA. Electronic address: rongxiang@wustl.edu.
Joset A EtzelDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1125, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
Alexander KizhnerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1125, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.
Todd S BraverDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1125, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130, USA; Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis 63130, Missouri, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive ControlR37MH066078 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRAVER, TODD S · 2013 to 2022
$7.2M
NEURAL MECHANISMS OF MINDFULNESS: A DISCORDANT TWIN DESIGNR21AT009483 · NCCIH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRAVER, TODD S · 2017 to 2018
$419k
Examining Mindfulness Training Effects and Mechanisms on Cognitive ControlF31AT010422 · NCCIH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TANG, RONGXIANG · 2019 to 2020
$78k
NCCIH NIH HHS F31 AT010422NCCIH NIH HHS R21 AT009483NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH066078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to flexibly adapt thoughts and actions in a goal-directed manner appears to rely on cognitive control mechanisms that are strongly impacted by individual differences. A powerful research strategy for investigating the nature of individual variation is to study monozygotic (identical) twins. Evidence of twin effects have been observed in prior behavioral and neuroimaging studies, yet within the domain of cognitive control, it remains to be demonstrated that the neural underpinnings of such effects are specific and reliable. Here, we utilize a multi-task, within-subjects event-related neuroimaging design with functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate twin effects through multivariate pattern similarity analyses. We focus on fronto-parietal brain regions exhibiting consistently increased activation associated with cognitive control demands across four task domains: selective attention, context processing, multi-tasking, and working memory. Healthy young adult monozygotic twin pairs exhibited increased similarity of within- and cross-task activation patterns in these fronto-parietal regions, relative to unrelated pairs. Twin activation pattern similarity effects were clearest under high control demands, were not present in a set of task-unrelated parcels or due to anatomic similarity, and were primarily observed during the within-trial timepoints in which the control demands peaked. Together, these results indicate that twin similarity in the neural representation of cognitive control may be domain-general but also functionally and temporally specific in relation to the level of control demand. The findings suggest a genetic and/or environmental basis for individual variation in cognitive control function, and highlight the potential of twin-based neuroimaging designs for exploring heritability questions within this domain.

Indexed as

AdultCognitionFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParietal LobePsychomotor PerformanceStroop TestTwins, MonozygoticCognitive controlDomain-generalFronto-parietal networkPattern similarityTwins

Identifiers

PMID34298081
PMCPMC8958982
OpenAlexW3186406657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.