Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34297912›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2021

Asymmetric nuclear division in neural stem cells generates sibling nuclei that differ in size, envelope composition, and chromatin organization.

Chantal Roubinet, Ian J White, Buzz Baum

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Asymmetric centromere and gene locus positioning inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mitotic chromosome condensation resets chromatin to safeguard transcriptional homeostasis during interphase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Regulation of organelle size and organization during development.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chantal RoubinetMRC Laboratory for Molecular Biology, University College London, London, UK; MRC Laboratory of Molecular Cell Biology, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: c.roubinet@ucl.ac.uk.
Ian J WhiteMRC Laboratory for Molecular Biology, University College London, London, UK.
Buzz BaumMRC Laboratory for Molecular Biology, University College London, London, UK; Institute for the Physics of Living Systems, University College London, London, UK; MRC Laboratory of Molecular Cell Biology, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: bbaum@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.
MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R009732/1Cancer Research UK 28276Cancer Research UK C1529/A17343Medical Research Council MC_UP_1201/27
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although nuclei are the defining features of eukaryotes, we still do not fully understand how the nuclear compartment is duplicated and partitioned during division. This is especially the case for organisms that do not completely disassemble their nuclear envelope upon entry into mitosis. In studying this process in Drosophila neural stem cells, which undergo asymmetric divisions, we find that the nuclear compartment boundary persists during mitosis thanks to the maintenance of a supporting nuclear lamina. This mitotic nuclear envelope is then asymmetrically remodeled and partitioned to give rise to two daughter nuclei that differ in envelope composition and exhibit a >30-fold difference in volume. The striking difference in nuclear size was found to depend on two consecutive processes: asymmetric nuclear envelope resealing at mitotic exit at sites defined by the central spindle, and differential nuclear growth that appears to depend on the available local reservoir of ER/nuclear membranes, which is asymmetrically partitioned between the two daughter cells. Importantly, these asymmetries in size and composition of the daughter nuclei, and the associated asymmetries in chromatin organization, all become apparent long before the cortical release and the nuclear import of cell fates determinants. Thus, asymmetric nuclear remodeling during stem cell divisions may contribute to the generation of cellular diversity by initiating distinct transcriptional programs in sibling nuclei that contribute to later changes in daughter cell identity and fate.

Indexed as

Neural Stem CellsSiblingsCell NucleusCell Nucleus DivisionChromatinHumansMitosisNuclear EnvelopeChromatinasymmetric divisioncell fatechromatinclosed mitosiscytokinesisnuclear divisionnuclear envelope remodellingopen mitosisspindlestem cells

Identifiers

PMID34297912
PMCPMC8491657
OpenAlexW3187031148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.