Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34297841›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2022

Community engagement in deprived neighbourhoods during the COVID-19 crisis: perspectives for more resilient and healthier communities.

Lea den Broeder, Jane South, Auke Rothoff, Anne-Marie Bagnall, Firoez Azarhoosh, Gina van der Linden, Meena Bharadwa, Annemarie Wagemakers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lea den BroederFaculty of Health, ACHIEVE, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Tafelbergweg 51, Amsterdam 1105 BD, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1927-4530
Jane SouthCentre for Health Promotion Research, School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1462-7632
Auke RothoffHealth and Society, Social Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 8130,Wageningen 6700 EW, The Netherlands.
Anne-Marie BagnallCentre for Health Promotion Research, School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK.
Firoez AzarhooshIndische Buurtbalie, Buurtruimte de Meevaart, Balistraat 48A, Amsterdam 1094 JN, The Netherlands.
Gina van der LindenSt Eigenwijks, Albardakade 5-7, Amsterdam 1067 DD, The Netherlands.
Meena BharadwaLocality, 33 Corsham Street, London N1 6DR, UK.
Annemarie WagemakersHealth and Society, Social Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 8130,Wageningen 6700 EW, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1212-6888
Leeds Beckett University · GBWageningen University & Research · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current COVID-19 pandemic confines people to their homes, disrupting the fragile social fabric of deprived neighbourhoods and citizen's participation options. In deprived neighbourhoods, community engagement is central in building community resilience, an important resource for health and a prerequisite for effective health promotion programmes. It provides access to vulnerable groups and helps understand experiences, assets, needs and problems of citizens. Most importantly, community activities, including social support, primary care or improving urban space, enhance health through empowerment, strengthened social networks, mutual respect and providing a sense of purpose and meaning. In the context of inequalities associated with COVID-19, these aspects are crucial for citizens of deprived neighbourhoods who often feel their needs and priorities are ignored. In this perspectives paper, illustrated by a varied overview of community actions in the UK and The Netherlands, we demonstrate how citizens, communities and organizations may build resilience and community power. Based on in-depth discussion among the authors we distilled six features of community actions: increase in mutual aid and neighbourhood ties, the central role of community-based organizations (CBOs), changing patterns of volunteering, use of digital media and health promotion opportunities. We argue that in order to enable and sustain resilient and confident, 'disaster-proof', communities, areas which merit investment include supporting active citizens, new (digital) ways of community engagement, transforming formal organizations, alignment with the (local) context and applying knowledge in the field of health promotion in new ways, focussing on learning and co-creation with citizen initiatives.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health StatusHumansInternetPandemicsResidence Characteristicscommunity engagementcommunity resilienceCOVID-19health promotion

Identifiers

PMID34297841
PMCPMC8414056
OpenAlexW3184899063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.