Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34297832›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2022

Media coverage of COVID-19 health information in India: a content analysis.

Medhavi Gupta, Vikash Ranjan Keshri, Pompy Konwar, Katherine L Cox, And Jagnoor Jagnoor

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Medhavi GuptaInjury Division, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, 1 King Street, Newtown, 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6558-8373
Vikash Ranjan KeshriInjury Division, The George Institute for Global Health, 308-309, Third Floor, Elegance Tower, Plot No. 8, Jasola District Centre, New Delhi, 110025, India.
Pompy KonwarInjury Division, The George Institute for Global Health, 308-309, Third Floor, Elegance Tower, Plot No. 8, Jasola District Centre, New Delhi, 110025, India.
Katherine L CoxInjury Division, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, 1 King Street, Newtown, 2052, Australia.
And Jagnoor JagnoorInjury Division, The George Institute for Global Health, 308-309, Third Floor, Elegance Tower, Plot No. 8, Jasola District Centre, New Delhi, 110025, India.
George Institute for Global Health · INUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research CouncilNational Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) Early Career Fellowship APP1104745Research Training Program scholarshipUniversity of New South Wales
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic is dependent on individual understanding of the disease and compliance to prevention measures. Early media depiction of health information about COVID-19 may influence public perceptions and behaviour. Media should ensure coverage is relevant, timely and actionable to encourage individuals to respond appropriately. India has been particularly affected by a large COVID-19 caseload. We analysed online reporting in India to assess how well the media represented health information about COVID-19 as per the World Health Organization's Strategic Risk Communications guidelines. This included media coverage of symptoms, transmission and prevention. We found that limited articles (18.8%) provided actionable suggestions to readers, including urging people to stay at home and social distance. Most articles were relevant as per WHO COVID-19 updates, accurately covering symptoms, risk factors for severe symptoms, transmission and prevention. However, 40% of media coverage of treatments options provided misleading information, such as suggesting plasma therapy or chloroquine, were effective. In addition, only 1.9% of articles included discussion of equity issues, where many prevention activities such as distancing are less applicable in lower-income households. Sixty-seven per cent of articles quoting sources of information quoted credible sources such as public health agencies and researchers. Media coverage also did not appear to reflect WHO updates in a timely manner, with most of the coverage preceding these updates. The findings show that Indian media should focus on actionable and relevant reporting that provides guidance for individual response. Media should also endeavour to report on evidence-based prevention and treatment options to avert the spread of misinformation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaCommunicationHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2communicationCOVID-19health behaviourhealth informationmedia

Identifiers

PMID34297832
PMCPMC8414059
OpenAlexW3184978781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.