Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34297790›Full record

ArticleJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2021

Incidence and Risk of Suicide Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer in Rural, Urban, and Metropolitan Areas.

Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters, Justin M Barnes, Somtochi I Okafor, Derian B Taylor, Adnan S Hussaini, Eric Adjei Boakye, Matthew C Simpson, Evan M Graboyes, Walter T Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cancer care coordination determinants of depression in head and neck cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Patient-Reported Distress in Individuals With Head and Neck Cancer.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Incidence and risk factors for suicidal ideation in a sample of Chinese patients with mixed cancer types.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Nosayaba Osazuwa-PetersDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Justin M BarnesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Somtochi I OkaforDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Derian B TaylorSt Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Adnan S HussainiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Eric Adjei BoakyeDepartment of Population Science and Policy, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield.
Matthew C SimpsonDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, St Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Evan M GraboyesEditorial Board Member, JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery.
Walter T LeeDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Saint Louis University · USDuke Cancer InstituteDuke Medical Center · USDuke University · USGeorgetown University · USMedical University of South Carolina · USSouthern Illinois University School of Medicine · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Suicide risk detection and mitigation in patients with head and neck cancerK01DE030916 · NIDCR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI OSAZUWA-PETERS, NOSAYABA · 2021 to 2025
$821k
NIDCR NIH HHS K01 DE030916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) are known to be at increased risk of suicide compared with the general population, but there has been insufficient research on whether this risk differs based on patients' rural, urban, or metropolitan residence status. Objective: To evaluate whether the risk of suicide among patients with HNC differs by rural vs urban or metropolitan residence status. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study uses data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database on patients aged 18 to 74 years who received a diagnosis of HNC from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2016. Statistical analysis was conducted from November 27, 2020, to June 3, 2021. Exposures: Residence status, assessed using 2013 Rural Urban Continuum Codes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Death due to suicide was assessed by International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes (U03, X60-X84, and Y87.0) and the cause of death recode (50220). Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) of suicide, assessing the suicide risk among patients with HNC compared with the general population, were calculated. Suicide risk by residence status was compared using Fine-Gray proportional hazards regression models. Results: Data from 134 510 patients with HNC (101 142 men [75.2%]; mean [SE] age, 57.7 [10.3] years) were analyzed, and 405 suicides were identified. Metropolitan residents composed 86.6% of the sample, urban residents composed 11.7%, and rural residents composed 1.7%. The mortality rate of suicide was 59.2 per 100 000 person-years in metropolitan counties, 64.0 per 100 000 person-years in urban counties, and 126.7 per 100 000 person-years in rural counties. Compared with the general population, the risk of suicide was markedly higher among patients with HNC in metropolitan (SMR, 2.78; 95% CI, 2.49-3.09), urban (SMR, 2.84; 95% CI, 2.13-3.71), and rural (SMR, 5.47; 95% CI, 3.06-9.02) areas. In Fine-Gray competing-risk analyses that adjusted for other covariates, there was no meaningful difference in suicide risk among urban vs metropolitan residents. However, compared with rural residents, residents of urban (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29-0.94) and metropolitan counties (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94) had greatly lower risk of suicide. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that suicide risk is elevated in general among patients with HNC but is significantly higher for patients residing in rural areas. Effective suicide prevention strategies in the population of patients with HNC need to account for rural health owing to the high risk of suicide among residents with HNC in rural areas.

Indexed as

Residence CharacteristicsAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsRural Health

Identifiers

PMID34297790
PMCPMC8304170
OpenAlexW3183211862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.