Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34297759›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

A structure-based engineering approach to abrogate pre-existing antibody binding to biotherapeutics.

Joanne Lin, Stacey L Lee, Anna M Russell, Rong Fong Huang, Micheal A Batt, Shawn S Chang, Andrea Ferrante, Petra Verdino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. VInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joanne LinEli Lilly & Co, Lilly Biotechnology Center, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Stacey L LeeEli Lilly & Co, Lilly Biotechnology Center, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Anna M RussellEli Lilly & Co, Lilly Biotechnology Center, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Rong Fong HuangEli Lilly & Co, Lilly Biotechnology Center, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Micheal A BattEli Lilly & Co, Lilly Biotechnology Center, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Shawn S ChangEli Lilly & Co, Lilly Biotechnology Center, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Andrea FerranteEli Lilly & Co, Lilly Biotechnology Center, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Petra VerdinoEli Lilly & Co, Lilly Biotechnology Center, San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4914-0659

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of biotherapeutics is hampered by the inherent risk of immunogenicity, which requires extensive clinical assessment and possible re-engineering efforts for mitigation. The focus in the pre-clinical phase is to determine the likelihood of developing treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (TE-ADA) and presence of pre-existing ADA in drug-naïve individuals as risk-profiling strategies. Pre-existing ADAs are routinely identified during clinical immunogenicity assessment, but their origin and impact on drug safety and efficacy have not been fully elucidated. One specific class of pre-existing ADAs has been described, which targets neoepitopes of antibody fragments, including Fabs, VH, or VHH domains in isolation from their IgG context. With the increasing number of antibody fragments and other small binding scaffolds entering the clinic, a widely applicable method to mitigate pre-existing reactivity against these molecules is desirable. Here is described a structure-based engineering approach to abrogate pre-existing ADA reactivity to the C-terminal neoepitope of VH(H)s. On the basis of 3D structures, small modifications applicable to any VH(H) are devised that would not impact developability or antigen binding. In-silico B cell epitope mapping algorithms were used to rank the modified VHH variants by antigenicity; however, the limited discriminating capacity of the computational methods prompted an experimental evaluation of the engineered molecules. The results identified numerous modifications capable of reducing pre-existing ADA binding. The most efficient consisted of the addition of two proline residues at the VHH C-terminus, which led to no detectable pre-existing ADA reactivity while maintaining favorable developability characteristics. The method described, and the modifications identified thereby, may provide a broadly applicable solution to mitigate immunogenicity risk of antibody-fragments in the clinic and increase safety and efficacy of this promising new class of biotherapeutics.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationBiological FactorsB-LymphocytesEpitopesHumansProtein BindingSingle-Domain AntibodiesBiological FactorsEpitopesSingle-Domain Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID34297759
PMCPMC8301669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.