Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34297740›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

Facing the COVID-19 pandemic inside maternities in Brazil: A mixed-method study within the REBRACO initiative.

Maria Laura Costa, Renato T Souza, Rodolfo C Pacagnella, Silvana F Bento, Carolina C Ribeiro-do-Valle, Adriana G Luz, Giuliane J Lajos, Guilherme M Nobrega, Thayna B Griggio, Charles M Charles and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of the uptake and usability of the pregnant women surveillance system (SIMG): A cross-sectional pilot study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Placentas From SARS-CoV-2 Infection During Pregnancy Exhibit Foci of Oxidative Stress and DNA Damage.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2025
    Article
  4. Five years after the COVID-19 pandemic began: lessons on vaccination and obstetric care in Brazil.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  5. Looking back to the recent past: the influence of national health policies and vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal health.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Laura CostaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas/SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8280-3234
Renato T SouzaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas/SP, Brazil.
Rodolfo C PacagnellaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas/SP, Brazil.
Silvana F BentoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas/SP, Brazil.
Carolina C Ribeiro-do-ValleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas/SP, Brazil.
Adriana G LuzDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas/SP, Brazil.
Giuliane J LajosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas/SP, Brazil.
Guilherme M NobregaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas/SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9406-4256
Thayna B GriggioDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas/SP, Brazil.
Charles M CharlesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas/SP, Brazil.
Ricardo P TedescoFaculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí HU/FMJ, Jundiaí/SP, Brazil.
Karayna G FernandesFaculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí HU/FMJ, Jundiaí/SP, Brazil.
Sérgio H A Martins-CostaHospital das Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil.
Frederico J A PeretMaternidade UNIMED UNIMED/BH, Belo Horizonte/MG, Brazil.
Francisco E FeitosaUniversidade Federal do Ceará MEAC/UFC, Fortaleza/CE, Brazil.
Rosiane MattarUniversidade Federal de São Paulo UNIFESP/EPM, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
Edson V Cunha FilhoHospital Moinhos de Vento-HMV, Porto Alegre/R, Brazil.
Janete VetorazziHospital das Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil.
Samira M HaddadHospital Regional Jorge Rossmann Instituto Sócrates Guanaes, Itanhaém/SP, Brazil.
Carla B AndreucciUniversidade Federal de São Carlos/UFSCAR, São Carlos/SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5590-108X
José P GuidaHospital Estadual Sumaré HES, Sumaré/SP, Brazil.
Mário D Correa JuniorUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais HC/UFMG, Belo Horizonte/MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4198-0546
Marcos A B DiasInstituto Fernandes Figueira IFF/Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil.
Leandro G OliveiraFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo, Botucatu/SP, Brazil.
Elias F Melo JuniorUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco HC/UFPE, Recife/PE, Brazil.
Carlos A S MenezesMaternidade Climério de Oliveira MCO-UFBA, Salvador/BA, Brazil.
Marília G Q LuzSanta Casa de Misericórdia do Pará, Belém/PA, Brazil.
Jose G CecattiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas/SP, Brazil.
REBRACO Study Group
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRFaculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí · BRHospital Moinhos de Vento · BRCentro Universitário de Belo Horizonte · BRFaculdade Sumaré · BRFundação Instituto de Pesca do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BRSanta Casa de Misericórdia de Marília · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Ceará · BRUniversidade Salgado de Oliveira · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCOVID-19 pandemic posed major challenges in obstetric health care services. Preparedness, development, and implementation of new protocols were part of the needed response. This study aims to describe the strategies implemented and the perspectives of health managers on the challenges to face the pandemic in 16 different maternity hospitals that comprise a multicenter study in Brazil, called REBRACO (Brazilian network of COVID-19 during pregnancy).

methodsMixed-method study, with quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quantitative data on the infrastructure of the units, maternal and perinatal health indicators, modifications on staff and human resources, from January to July/2020. Also, information on total number of cases, and availability for COVID-19 testing. A qualitative study by purposeful and saturation sampling was undertaken with healthcare managers, to understand perspectives on local challenges in facing the pandemic.

resultsMost maternities early implemented their contingency plan. REBRACO centers reported 338 confirmed COVID-19 cases among pregnant and post-partum women up to July 2020. There were 29 maternal deaths and 15 (51.8%) attributed to COVID-19. All maternities performed relocation of beds designated to labor ward, most (75%) acquired mechanical ventilators, only the minority (25%) installed new negative air pressure rooms. Considering human resources, around 40% hired extra health professionals and increased weekly workload and the majority (68.7%) also suspended annual leaves. Only one center implemented universal screening for childbirth and 6 (37.5%) implemented COVID-19 testing for all suspected cases, while around 60% of the centers only tested moderate/severe cases with hospital admission. Qualitative results showed that main challenges experienced were related to the fear of the virus, concerns about reliability of evidence and lack of resources, with a clear need for mental health support among health professionals.

conclusionStudy findings suggest that maternities of the REBRACO initiative underwent major changes in facing the pandemic, with limitations on testing, difficulties in infrastructure and human resources. Leadership, continuous training, implementation of evidence-based protocols and collaborative initiatives are key to transpose the fear of the virus and ascertain adequate healthcare inside maternities, especially in low and middle-income settings. Policy makers need to address the specificities in considering reproductive health and childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic and prioritize research and timely testing availability.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingPandemicsParturitionPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSARS-CoV-2AdultFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID34297740
PMCPMC8301675
OpenAlexW3184988799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.