Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34297719›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

Twelve-month findings of the MOVE Frankston randomised controlled trial of interventions to increase recreation facility usage and physical activity among adults.

Ben J Smith, Ruth Mackenzie-Stewart, Fiona J Newton, Karine E Manera, Tilahun N Haregu, Adrian Bauman, Robert J Donovan, Ajay Mahal, Michael T Ewing, Joshua D Newton

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ben J SmithSchool of Public Health, Level 6, The Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6227-5566
Ruth Mackenzie-StewartSchool of Psychology and Public Health, LaTrobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Fiona J NewtonDepartment of Marketing, Monash Business School, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Karine E ManeraSchool of Public Health, Level 6, The Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Tilahun N HareguNossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Adrian BaumanSchool of Public Health, Level 6, The Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Robert J DonovanSchool of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4160-2967
Ajay MahalNossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michael T EwingDepartment of Marketing, Deakin Business School, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Joshua D NewtonDepartment of Marketing, Deakin Business School, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUDeakin University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AULa Trobe University · AUMonash University · AUThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial cross-sectional evidence and limited longitudinal research indicates that the availability of recreational facilities (e.g., parks, fitness centres) is associated with physical activity participation. However, few intervention trials have investigated how recreational infrastructure can be used to reduce inactivity levels in communities. The MOVE Frankston study aimed to assess the impact of low intensity strategies to promote use of a multi-purpose leisure and aquatic centre in a socioeconomically diverse, metropolitan community. This randomised controlled trial of two years' duration compared public awareness raising (control condition) with two interventions: mailed information about the centre and a free entry pass (I-O); and this minimal intervention supplemented by customer relations management support through telephone contact, mailed promotional materials and additional incentives (I+S). Participants (n = 1320) were inactive adults living in the City of Frankston, Melbourne Australia. There were 928 people (70.3%) followed up at 12 months (61.2% female, 52% ≥55 yrs). Compared with controls, attendance at the Centre once or more was higher in both the I-O (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.28-2.50) and I+S groups (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.03-2.07). The proportion of people using the centre weekly did not differ by group. The odds of being in contemplation or preparation to use the Centre were higher in both the I-O (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.28-2.42) and I+S groups (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.07-2.06). Total physical activity and related social and cognitive factors did not differ between the groups. The findings show that the low intensity promotional strategies prompted occasional attendance and increased readiness to use this recreational facility, a level of behaviour change unlikely to reduce non-communicable disease risk. It is recommended that more frequent customer relations contact, and involvement of healthcare providers, be tested as strategies to encourage inactive adults to take up physical activity opportunities at recreational facilities of this type.

Indexed as

ExerciseAdultAustraliaFemaleFitness CentersHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID34297719
PMCPMC8301672
OpenAlexW3186897205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.