Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34297716›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Burden of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) in India based on data from cross-sectional serosurveys, 2017 and 2019-20.

Devika Shanmugasundaram, Shally Awasthi, Bhagirathi Dwibedi, S Geetha, Manish Jain, Shikha Malik, Bhupeshwari Patel, Himabindu Singh, Shalini Tripathi, Rajlakshmi Viswanathan and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Devika ShanmugasundaramICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Shally AwasthiKing George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1254-9802
Bhagirathi DwibediAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5318-6836
S GeethaGovt Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8905-9292
Manish JainMahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sewagram, Maharashtra, India.
Shikha MalikAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6264-4800
Bhupeshwari PatelAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6335-3805
Himabindu SinghNilofer Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2178-9763
Shalini TripathiKing George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0805-7370
Rajlakshmi ViswanathanICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1517-0454
Anjoo AgarwalKing George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4616-177X
Rajeswari BonuNilofer Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Shuchi JainMahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sewagram, Maharashtra, India.
Saubhagya Kumar JenaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1041-3541
J PriyasreeGovt Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6310-4232
K PushpalathaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Syed AliGovt Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Debasis BiswasAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Amita JainKing George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3195-0220
Rahul NarangMahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sewagram, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9973-5311
Sudha MadhuriNilofer Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3587-8895
Suji GeorgeICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Ojas KaduskarICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2742-0366
G KiruthikaICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9431-2042
R SabarinathanICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1803-9977
Gajanan SapakalICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Nivedita GuptaIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Manoj V MurhekarICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1720-7628

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndia has set a goal to eliminate measles and rubella/Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) by 2023. Towards this goal, India conducted nationwide supplementary immunization activity (SIA) with measles-rubella containing vaccine (MRCV) targeting children aged between 9 months to <15 years and established a hospital-based sentinel surveillance for CRS. Reliable data about incidence of CRS is necessary to monitor progress towards the elimination goal.

methodsWe conducted serosurveys in 2019-20 among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics of 6 hospitals, which were also sentinel sites for CRS surveillance, to estimate the prevalence of IgG antibodies against rubella. We systematically sampled 1800 women attending antenatal clinics and tested their sera for IgG antibodies against rubella. We used rubella seroprevalence data from the current survey and the survey conducted in 2017 among antenatal women from another 6 CRS surveillance sites to construct a catalytic models to estimate the incidence and burden of CRS.

resultThe seroprevalence of rubella antibodies was 82.3% (95% CI: 80.4-84.0). Rubella seropositivity did not differ by age group and educational status. Based on the constant and age-dependent force of infection models, we estimated that the annual incidence of CRS in India was 225.58 per 100,000 live births (95% CI: 217.49-232.41) and 65.47 per 100,000 live births (95% CI: 41.60-104.16) respectively. This translated to an estimated 14,520 (95% CI: 9,225-23,100) and 50,028 (95% CI: 48,234-51,543) infants with CRS every year based on age-dependent and constant force of infection models respectively.

conclusionsOur findings indicated that about one fifth of women in the reproductive age group in India were susceptible for rubella. The estimates of CRS incidence will serve as a baseline to monitor the impact of MRCV SIAs, as well progress towards the elimination goal of rubella/CRS.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntibodies, ViralChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GIncidenceIndiaInfantMaleRubella Syndrome, CongenitalSeroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID34297716
PMCPMC8376255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.