Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34297325›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2021

The karyotype, genome survey, and assembly of Mud artemisia (Artemisia selengensis).

Heping Wan, Qingying Wei, Qiangqiang Ji, Hong Lan, Xigang Dai, Weida Chen, Yuanhuo Dong, Changli Zeng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. FirstFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heping Wan *Hubei Engineering Research Center for Protection and Utilization of Special Biological Resources in the Hanjiang River BasinSchool of Life Science, Jianghan University, Wuhan, 430056, China.
Qingying Wei *Hubei Engineering Research Center for Protection and Utilization of Special Biological Resources in the Hanjiang River BasinSchool of Life Science, Jianghan University, Wuhan, 430056, China.
Qiangqiang Ji *Hubei Engineering Research Center for Protection and Utilization of Special Biological Resources in the Hanjiang River BasinSchool of Life Science, Jianghan University, Wuhan, 430056, China.
Hong LanHubei Engineering Research Center for Protection and Utilization of Special Biological Resources in the Hanjiang River BasinSchool of Life Science, Jianghan University, Wuhan, 430056, China.
Xigang DaiHubei Engineering Research Center for Protection and Utilization of Special Biological Resources in the Hanjiang River BasinSchool of Life Science, Jianghan University, Wuhan, 430056, China.
Weida ChenHubei Engineering Research Center for Protection and Utilization of Special Biological Resources in the Hanjiang River BasinSchool of Life Science, Jianghan University, Wuhan, 430056, China.
Yuanhuo DongHubei Engineering Research Center for Protection and Utilization of Special Biological Resources in the Hanjiang River BasinSchool of Life Science, Jianghan University, Wuhan, 430056, China.
Changli ZengHubei Engineering Research Center for Protection and Utilization of Special Biological Resources in the Hanjiang River BasinSchool of Life Science, Jianghan University, Wuhan, 430056, China. zengchangli6111@sohu.com.

Funding

general project of hubei natural science foundation 2020CFB640jianghan university high-level scientific research projects and other cultivation fund plans 06210010open fund project of engineering technology research center for protection, development and utilization of characteristic biological resources in the hanjiang river basin of hubei province 202010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtemisia selengensis is traditional Chinese medicine and phytochemical analysis indicated that A. selengensis contains essential oils, fatty acids and phenolic acids. The lack of reference genomic information may lead to tardiness in molecular biology research of A. selengensis. METHOD AND

resultsKaryotype analysis, genome survey, and genome assembly was employed to acquire information on the genome structure of A. selengensis. The chromosome number is 2n = 2x = 36, karyotype formula is 28 m + 8Sm, karyotype asymmetry coefficient is 58.8%, and karyotypes were symmetric to Stebbins' type 2A. Besides, the flow cytometry findings reported that the mean peak value of fluorescent intensity is 1,170,677, 2C DNA content is 12 pg and the genome size was estimated to be approximately 5.87 Gb. Furthermore, the genome survey generates 341,478,078 clean reads, unfortunately, after K-mer analysis, no significant peak can be observed, the heterozygosity, repetitive rate and genome size was unable to estimated. It is speculated that this phenomenon might be due to the complexity of genome structure. 37,266 contigs are preliminary assembled with Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) sequencing, totaling 804 Mb and GC content was 34.08%. The total length is 804,475,881 bp, N50 is 29,624 bp, and the largest contig length is 239,792 bp.

conclusionThis study reveals the preliminary information of genome size of A. selengensis. These findings may provide supportive information for sequencing and assembly of whole-genome sequencing and encourage the progress of functional gene discovery, genetic improvement, evolutionary study, and structural studies of A. selengensis.

Indexed as

ArtemisiaBase CompositionGenome SizeGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingKaryotypeKaryotypingMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNAWhole Genome SequencingArtemisia selengensisFlow cytometryGenome surveyKaryotype analysisOxford nanopore technology sequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.