Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34297308›Full record

ReviewNeuromolecular medicine2022

Emerging Technologies for Non-invasive Monitoring of Treatment Response to Immunotherapy for Brain Tumors.

Dimitrios Mathios, Siddhartha Srivastava, Timothy Kim, Chetan Bettegowda, Michael Lim

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neuromolecular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dimitrios Mathios *Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Siddhartha Srivastava *Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Timothy KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Chetan BettegowdaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michael LimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA. mklim@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0523-3076
Johns Hopkins University · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant brain tumor and one of the most aggressive tumors across all cancer types with remarkable resistance to any treatment. While immunotherapy has shown a robust clinical benefit in systemic cancers, its benefit is still under investigation in brain cancers. The broader use of immunotherapy in clinical trials for glioblastoma has highlighted the challenges of traditional methods of monitoring progression via imaging. Development of new guidelines, advanced imaging techniques, and immune profiling have emerged to counter premature diagnoses of progressive disease. However, these approaches do not provide a timely diagnosis and are costly and time consuming. Surgery is currently the standard of care for diagnosis of pseudoprogression in cases where MRI is equivocal. However, it is invasive, risky, and disruptive to patient's lives and their oncological treatment. With its increased vascularity, glioblastoma is continually shedding tumor components into the vasculature including tumor cells, genetic material, and extracellular vesicles. These elements can be isolated from routine blood draws and provide a real-time non-invasive indicator of tumor progression. Liquid biopsy therefore presents as an attractive alternative to current methods to guide treatment. While the initial evaluation of liquid biopsy for brain tumors via identification of mutations in the plasma was disappointing, novel technologies and use of alternatives to plasma cell-free DNA analytes provide promise for an effective liquid biopsy approach in brain tumors. This review aims to summarize developments in the use of liquid biopsy to monitor glioblastoma, especially in the context of immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaBiomarkers, TumorHumansImmunotherapyLiquid BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingBiomarkers, TumorCell-free DNAImmunotherapyLiquid biopsyPseudoprogressionTCR sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34297308
OpenAlexW3184294794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.