ReviewNeuromolecular medicine2022
Emerging Technologies for Non-invasive Monitoring of Treatment Response to Immunotherapy for Brain Tumors.
Review in Neuromolecular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bi-specific T cell-engaging antibody triggers protective immune memory and glioma microenvironment remodeling in immune-competent preclinical models.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- Harnessing liquid biopsies: Exosomes and ctDNA as minimally invasive biomarkers for precision cancer medicine.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2023Review
- Pseudoprogression versus true progression in glioblastoma: what neurosurgeons need to know.Journal of neurosurgery · 2023Review
- Advances in molecular biomarkers and liquid biopsy in gliomas.Neuro-oncology advances · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant brain tumor and one of the most aggressive tumors across all cancer types with remarkable resistance to any treatment. While immunotherapy has shown a robust clinical benefit in systemic cancers, its benefit is still under investigation in brain cancers. The broader use of immunotherapy in clinical trials for glioblastoma has highlighted the challenges of traditional methods of monitoring progression via imaging. Development of new guidelines, advanced imaging techniques, and immune profiling have emerged to counter premature diagnoses of progressive disease. However, these approaches do not provide a timely diagnosis and are costly and time consuming. Surgery is currently the standard of care for diagnosis of pseudoprogression in cases where MRI is equivocal. However, it is invasive, risky, and disruptive to patient's lives and their oncological treatment. With its increased vascularity, glioblastoma is continually shedding tumor components into the vasculature including tumor cells, genetic material, and extracellular vesicles. These elements can be isolated from routine blood draws and provide a real-time non-invasive indicator of tumor progression. Liquid biopsy therefore presents as an attractive alternative to current methods to guide treatment. While the initial evaluation of liquid biopsy for brain tumors via identification of mutations in the plasma was disappointing, novel technologies and use of alternatives to plasma cell-free DNA analytes provide promise for an effective liquid biopsy approach in brain tumors. This review aims to summarize developments in the use of liquid biopsy to monitor glioblastoma, especially in the context of immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.