Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34297218›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2021

A multicentre and multi-national evaluation of the accuracy of quantitative Lu-177 SPECT/CT imaging performed within the MRTDosimetry project.

Johannes Tran-Gia, Ana M Denis-Bacelar, Kelley M Ferreira, Andrew P Robinson, Nicholas Calvert, Andrew J Fenwick, Domenico Finocchiaro, Federica Fioroni, Elisa Grassi, Warda Heetun and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dosimetry of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Tumor and Organ Dose Estimates fromJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Trial
  3. High Quantitative Accuracy Is Possible withJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Dosimetry-Driven Personalization of Radiopharmaceutical Therapies: Evidence and Opportunities.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Validation of Simplified Renal Dosimetry Protocols forMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2026
    Article
  9. Quantitative accuracy ofEJNMMI physics · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. OpenDose3D: A Free, Open-Source Clinical Dosimetry Software for Patient-Specific Dosimetry.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  15. Quantitative SPECT/CT: Technique and Clinical Applications.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Recommendations for Standardizing Nuclear Medicine Terminology and Data in the Era of Theranostics and Artificial Intelligence.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. 360° CZT-SPECT/CT cameras:EJNMMI physics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Johannes Tran-GiaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. Tran_J@ukw.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9552-7750
Ana M Denis-BacelarNational Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
Kelley M FerreiraNational Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
Andrew P RobinsonNational Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
Nicholas CalvertChristie Medical Physics and Engineering (CMPE), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Andrew J FenwickNational Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
Domenico FinocchiaroMedical Physics Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Reggio Emilia-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Federica FioroniMedical Physics Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Reggio Emilia-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Elisa GrassiMedical Physics Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Reggio Emilia-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Warda HeetunNational Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
Stephanie J JewittRadiation Physics and Protection, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Maria KotzassarlidouNuclear Medicine Department, "THEAGENIO" Anticancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Michael LjungbergMedical Radiation Physics, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Daniel R McGowanRadiation Physics and Protection, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Nathaniel ScottRadiation Physics and Protection, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
James ScuffhamNational Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
Katarina Sjögreen GleisnerMedical Radiation Physics, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jill TippingChristie Medical Physics and Engineering (CMPE), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Jill WevrettNational Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
MRTDosimetry Collaboration
Michael LassmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
National Physical Laboratory · GBAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITChurchill Hospital · GBUniversity of Würzburg · DELund University · SEThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBTheageneio General Hospital · GR

Funding

European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research 15HLT06 MRTDosimetryNational Measurement System of the UK's Department for Business, Energy, and Industrial Strategy N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient-specific dosimetry is required to ensure the safety of molecular radiotherapy and to predict response. Dosimetry involves several steps, the first of which is the determination of the activity of the radiopharmaceutical taken up by an organ/lesion over time. As uncertainties propagate along each of the subsequent steps (integration of the time-activity curve, absorbed dose calculation), establishing a reliable activity quantification is essential. The MRTDosimetry project was a European initiative to bring together expertise in metrology and nuclear medicine research, with one main goal of standardizing quantitative

methodsThe inter-comparison included nine SPECT/CT systems. Each site performed a set of three measurements with the same setup (system, acquisition and reconstruction): (1) Determination of an image calibration for conversion from counts to activity concentration (large cylinder phantom), (2) determination of recovery coefficients for partial volume correction (IEC NEMA PET body phantom with sphere inserts), (3) validation of the established quantitative imaging setup using a 3D printed two-organ phantom (ICRP110-based kidney and spleen). In contrast to previous efforts, traceability of the activity measurement was required for each participant, and all participants were asked to calculate uncertainties for their SPECT-based activities.

resultsSimilar combinations of imaging system and reconstruction lead to similar image calibration factors. The activity ratio results of the anthropomorphic phantom validation demonstrate significant harmonization of quantitative imaging performance between the sites with all sites falling within one standard deviation of the mean values for all inserts. Activity recovery was underestimated for total kidney, spleen, and kidney cortex, while it was overestimated for the medulla.

conclusionThis international comparison exercise demonstrates that harmonization of quantitative SPECT/CT is feasible when following very specific instructions of a dedicated calibration protocol, as developed within the MRTDosimetry project. While quantitative imaging performance demonstrates significant harmonization, an over- and underestimation of the activity recovery highlights the limitations of any partial volume correction in the presence of spill-in and spill-out between two adjacent volumes of interests.

Indexed as

177Lu SPECT/CT imaging3D printingHarmonization of SPECT/CT imagingInternational multicenter comparison exerciseMolecular radiotherapy (MRT)PhantomQuantitative SPECT/CTStandardization of SPECT/CT imagingTraceability of SPECT/CT imaging

Identifiers

PMID34297218
PMCPMC8302709
OpenAlexW3186573596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.