ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2022
[What (abdominal) surgeons must know about aspects of autonomic decisions with respect to self-determination, advance healthcare directives and suicide].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The right of patients to self-determination has become increasingly important in recent decades. In clinical practice, it finds concrete expression in the concept of informed consent, according to which medical interventions outside of emergency situations are only permissible with the consent of the informed patient. In the event that the patient later becomes incapable of giving consent, it is possible to document the patient's own treatment wishes in a living will or to appoint a trusted person as a proxy. The right to self-determination reaches its limits where the patient demands medical measures for which there is no medical indication, which are prohibited by law or which contradict the physician's conscience. The latter applies to physician-assisted suicide, which is legally permissible but which physicians cannot be obliged to perform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34297150What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.