Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34296811›Full record

ArticleBirth defects research2021

Maternal exposure to hydroxychloroquine and birth defects.

Meredith M Howley, Martha M Werler, Sarah C Fisher, Alissa R Van Zutphen, Suzan L Carmichael, Cheryl S Broussard, Dominique Heinke, Elizabeth C Ailes, Shannon M Pruitt, Jennita Reefhuis and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth defects research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prevalence of congenital anomalies in newborns: a cross-sectional study in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2019-2021.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Meredith M HowleyBirth Defects Registry, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8420-5040
Martha M WerlerDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sarah C FisherBirth Defects Registry, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4702-1007
Alissa R Van ZutphenBirth Defects Registry, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.
Suzan L CarmichaelDivision of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Cheryl S BroussardDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Dominique HeinkeCenter for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9217-3723
Elizabeth C AilesDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Shannon M PruittDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jennita ReefhuisDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Allen A MitchellDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Marilyn L BrowneBirth Defects Registry, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.
National Birth Defects Prevention Study
New York State Department of Health · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USBoston University · USMassachusetts Department of Public Health · USOak Ridge Associated Universities · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

New York State Component A: BD-STEPS II CoreU01DD001227 · DD · CENTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH · PI HOWLEY, MEREDITH M · 2018 to 2022
$4.2M
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) FOA #DD09-001Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) FOA #DD13-003Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) NOFO #DD18-001Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) PA #02081Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) PA #96043NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001224NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHydroxychloroquine is a treatment for rheumatic disease and considered safe during pregnancy. Interest in hydroxychloroquine has increased as it is being examined as a potential treatment and prophylaxis for coronavirus disease 2019. Data on the risks of specific birth defects associated with hydroxychloroquine use are sparse.

methodsUsing data from two case-control studies (National Birth Defects Prevention Study and Slone Epidemiology Center Birth Defects Study), we described women who reported hydroxychloroquine use in pregnancy and the presence of specific major birth defects in their offspring. Cases had at least one major birth defect and controls were live-born healthy infants. Women self-reported medication use information in the few months before pregnancy through delivery.

resultsIn total, 0.06% (19/31,468) of case and 0.04% (5/11,614) of control mothers in National Birth Defects Prevention Study, and 0.04% (11/29,838) of case and 0.05% (7/12,868) of control mothers in Birth Defects Study reported hydroxychloroquine use. Hydroxychloroquine users had complicated medical histories and frequent medication use for a variety of conditions. The observed birth defects among women taking hydroxychloroquine were varied and included nine oral cleft cases; the elevated observed:expected ratios for specific oral cleft phenotypes and for oral clefts overall had 95% confidence intervals that included 1.0.

conclusionWhile teratogens typically produce a specific pattern of birth defects, the observed birth defects among the hydroxychloroquine-exposed women did not present a clear pattern, suggesting no meaningful evidence for the risk of specific birth defects. The number of exposed cases is small; results should be interpreted cautiously.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentPregnancy Complications, InfectiousFemaleHumansHydroxychloroquineMaternal ExposurePregnancySARS-CoV-2Hydroxychloroquinebirth defectshydroxychloroquinelupusrheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID34296811
PMCPMC8426694
OpenAlexW3183734657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.