Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34296745›Full record

ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2021

Transient, flexible gene editing in zebrafish neutrophils and macrophages for determination of cell-autonomous functions.

Abdulsalam I Isiaku, Zuobing Zhang, Vahid Pazhakh, Harriet R Manley, Ella R Thompson, Lucy C Fox, Satwica Yerneni, Piers Blombery, Graham J Lieschke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Adult zebrafish as advanced models of human disease.Disease models & mechanisms · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Sharing resources to advance translational research.Disease models & mechanisms · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdulsalam I IsiakuAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8354-8674
Zuobing ZhangAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5900-4976
Vahid PazhakhAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5337-778X
Harriet R ManleyAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0230-9381
Ella R ThompsonDepartment of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5206-5111
Lucy C FoxDepartment of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3855-8232
Satwica YerneniDepartment of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3709-842X
Piers BlomberyDepartment of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9902-0022
Graham J LieschkeAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0325-798X
The University of Melbourne · AUAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUShanxi University · CNThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zebrafish are an important model for studying phagocyte function, but rigorous experimental systems to distinguish whether phagocyte-dependent effects are neutrophil or macrophage specific have been lacking. We have developed and validated transgenic lines that enable superior demonstration of cell-autonomous neutrophil and macrophage genetic requirements. We coupled well-characterized neutrophil- and macrophage-specific Gal4 driver lines with UAS:Cas9 transgenes for selective expression of Cas9 in either neutrophils or macrophages. Efficient gene editing, confirmed by both Sanger and next-generation sequencing, occurred in both lineages following microinjection of efficacious synthetic guide RNAs into zebrafish embryos. In proof-of-principle experiments, we demonstrated molecular and/or functional evidence of on-target gene editing for several genes (mCherry, lamin B receptor, trim33) in either neutrophils or macrophages as intended. These new UAS:Cas9 tools provide an improved resource for assessing individual contributions of neutrophil- and macrophage-expressed genes to the many physiological processes and diseases modelled in zebrafish. Furthermore, this gene-editing functionality can be exploited in any cell lineage for which a lineage-specific Gal4 driver is available. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

Indexed as

Gene EditingZebrafishAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCRISPR-Cas SystemsHumansMacrophagesNeutrophilsTranscription FactorsTranscription FactorsTRIM33 protein, humanCell autonomyCRISPR-Cas9Gene editingMacrophagesNeutrophilsZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID34296745
PMCPMC8319549
OpenAlexW3183336533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.