Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34296737›Full record

ReviewEssays in biochemistry2021

Recent advances in microarray 3D bioprinting for high-throughput spheroid and tissue culture and analysis.

Sunil Shrestha, Vinod Kumar Reddy Lekkala, Prabha Acharya, Darshita Siddhpura, Moo-Yeal Lee

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Essays in biochemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Application of 3D Cell Culture in Thyroid Cancer.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Beyond monolayers: a comparative analysis of 2D cell cultures and 3DFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sunil Shrestha *Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle, Denton, Texas 76203, United States.
Vinod Kumar Reddy Lekkala *Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle, Denton, Texas 76203, United States.
Prabha AcharyaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle, Denton, Texas 76203, United States.
Darshita SiddhpuraDepartment of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland State University, 2121 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, Ohio 44115, United States.
Moo-Yeal LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle, Denton, Texas 76203, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6922-609X
University of North Texas · USCleveland State University · US

Funding

Modeling diabetes using an integrated plate systemUH3DK119982 · NIDDK · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI LEE, MOO-YEAL, WELLS, JAMES M · 2020 to 2022
$5.4M
Mechanistic Study of Developmental Neurotoxicity on 3D Cultured Stem Cell MicroarraysR01ES025779 · NIEHS · CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, MOO-YEAL · 2015 to 2018
$1.3M
Pillar and perfusion well plate platforms for reproducible organoid culture from iPSCR44TR003491 · NCATS · BIOPRINTING LABORATORIES, INC. · PI JOSHI, PRANAV, LEE, MOO-YEAL · 2020 to 2021
$838k
NCATS NIH HHS R44 TR003491NIDDK NIH HHS UH3 DK119982NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES025779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture in vitro has proven to be more physiologically relevant than two-dimensional (2D) culture of cell monolayers, thus more predictive in assessing efficacy and toxicity of compounds. There have been several 3D cell culture techniques developed, which include spheroid and multicellular tissue cultures. Cell spheroids have been generated from single or multiple cell types cultured in ultralow attachment (ULA) well plates and hanging droplet plates. In general, cell spheroids are formed in a relatively short period of culture, in the absence of extracellular matrices (ECMs), via gravity-driven self-aggregation, thus having limited ability to self-organization in layered structure. On the other hand, multicellular tissue cultures including miniature tissues derived from pluripotent stem cells and adult stem cells (a.k.a. 'organoids') and 3D bioprinted tissue constructs require biomimetic hydrogels or ECMs and show highly ordered structure due to spontaneous self-organization of cells during differentiation and maturation processes. In this short review article, we summarize traditional methods of spheroid and multicellular tissue cultures as well as their technical challenges, and introduce how droplet-based, miniature 3D bioprinting ('microarray 3D bioprinting') can be used to improve assay throughput and reproducibility for high-throughput, predictive screening of compounds. Several platforms including a micropillar chip and a 384-pillar plate developed to facilitate miniature spheroid and tissue cultures via microarray 3D bioprinting are introduced. We excluded microphysiological systems (MPSs) in this article although they are important tissue models to simulate multiorgan interactions.

Indexed as

BioprintingCell Culture TechniquesHydrogelsReproducibility of ResultsSpheroids, CellularHydrogels3D bioprintinghigh-throughput screeningorganoid culturespheroid culture

Identifiers

PMID34296737
PMCPMC9270997
OpenAlexW3184877234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.