ReviewEssays in biochemistry2021
Recent advances in microarray 3D bioprinting for high-throughput spheroid and tissue culture and analysis.
Review in Essays in biochemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Application of 3D Cell Culture in Thyroid Cancer.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- The application of experimental models for the drug discovery for digestive tumors.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Beyond monolayers: a comparative analysis of 2D cell cultures and 3DFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Review
- The neuro-immune-vascular landscape of lung cancer brain metastasis: insights from organoid models.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Real-Time Monitoring of the Formation and Culture of Hybrid Cell-Microbiomaterial Spheroids Using Non-Faradaic Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- Reproducible generation of human liver organoids (HLOs) on a pillar plate platformLab on a chip · 2024Article
- A Pillar/Perfusion Plate Enhances Cell Growth, Reproducibility, Throughput, and User Friendliness in Dynamic 3D Cell Culture.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Article
- Mi-BMSCs alleviate inflammation and fibrosis in CClMaterials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Brain organoids: A revolutionary tool for modeling neurological disorders and development of therapeutics.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2024Review
- Uniform cerebral organoid culture on a pillar plate by simple and reproducible spheroid transfer from an ultralow attachment well plate.Biofabrication · 2024Article
- Review
- Uniform cerebral organoid culture on a pillar plate by simple and reproducible spheroid transfer from an ultralow attachment well plate.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- The Progress in Bioprinting and Its Potential Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Imaging-based tracking of stem-cell responses for 3D bioprinting optimization.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture in vitro has proven to be more physiologically relevant than two-dimensional (2D) culture of cell monolayers, thus more predictive in assessing efficacy and toxicity of compounds. There have been several 3D cell culture techniques developed, which include spheroid and multicellular tissue cultures. Cell spheroids have been generated from single or multiple cell types cultured in ultralow attachment (ULA) well plates and hanging droplet plates. In general, cell spheroids are formed in a relatively short period of culture, in the absence of extracellular matrices (ECMs), via gravity-driven self-aggregation, thus having limited ability to self-organization in layered structure. On the other hand, multicellular tissue cultures including miniature tissues derived from pluripotent stem cells and adult stem cells (a.k.a. 'organoids') and 3D bioprinted tissue constructs require biomimetic hydrogels or ECMs and show highly ordered structure due to spontaneous self-organization of cells during differentiation and maturation processes. In this short review article, we summarize traditional methods of spheroid and multicellular tissue cultures as well as their technical challenges, and introduce how droplet-based, miniature 3D bioprinting ('microarray 3D bioprinting') can be used to improve assay throughput and reproducibility for high-throughput, predictive screening of compounds. Several platforms including a micropillar chip and a 384-pillar plate developed to facilitate miniature spheroid and tissue cultures via microarray 3D bioprinting are introduced. We excluded microphysiological systems (MPSs) in this article although they are important tissue models to simulate multiorgan interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.