Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34296552›Full record

ArticleYonsei medical journal2021

Knot-Tying versus Knotless Suture Anchors for Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Comparative Study.

Jae Woo Shim, Tae Wan Jung, Il Su Kim, Jae Chul Yoo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Degradation of an ultrasonically welded device for surgical suture holding.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fixation devices for anterior shoulder instability.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jae Woo ShimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3169-5197
Tae Wan JungDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3954-4318
Il Su KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6683-5276
Jae Chul YooDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. shoulderyoo@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8378-1583
Samsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to compare the results of using knotless and knot-tying suture anchors in arthroscopic Bankart repair. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair between 2011 and 2017 using knot-tying and knotless suture anchors were retrospectively reviewed. We collected demographic data, clinical scores (pain visual analogue scale), functional visual analogue scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Society scores, and Rowe score), and range of motion (ROM). Re-dislocation and subjective anterior apprehension test rates between the two techniques were also analyzed.

resultsOf the 154 patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair, 115 patients (knot-tying group: n=61 and knotless group: n=54) were included in this study. Of the 115 patients, 102 were male and 13 were female. The mean patient age was 27 years (range: 17-60), and the mean follow-up period was 43 months (range: 24-99). There were no significant differences in the final clinical scores and ROM between the two groups. Re-dislocation was observed in 6 (9.8%) and 4 (7.3%) patients in the knot-tying and knotless groups, respectively. Apprehension was observed in 11 (18.0%) and 12 (22.2%) patients in the knot-tying and knotless groups, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in regards to re-dislocation and anterior apprehension.

conclusionRe-dislocation rates and clinical scores were similar with the use of knotless and knot-tying suture anchors in arthroscopic Bankart repair after a minimal 2 year follow-up.

Indexed as

Suture AnchorsSuture TechniquesArthroscopyChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleRange of Motion, ArticularRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomearthroscopybankart lesionsjoint instabilityShouldersuture anchors

Identifiers

PMID34296552
PMCPMC8298872
OpenAlexW3186780288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.