Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34296337›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021

Assessment of Biolog Ecoplate

A Checcucci, D Luise, M Modesto, F Correa, P Bosi, P Mattarelli, Paolo Trevisi

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Checcucci *Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0019-0997
D Luise *Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7864-7822
M ModestoDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5159-5532
F CorreaDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8558-6503
P BosiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0755-8002
P MattarelliDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9112-4786
Paolo TrevisiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127, Bologna, Italy. paolo.trevisi@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7019-6828
University of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decades, gut microbiota and its role in mammal host development and health have been increasingly investigated. Metabolites produced by gut microbiota can affect intestinal homeostasis and immune system maturity and activation, and in turn, they can influence the health and growth performance of livestock. Therefore, a better understanding of the functional metabolic capability of the gut microbiota would be appreciated by the scientific community. In this study, the Biolog

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsFecesMammalsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwineRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBiologTM Ecoplates, Sample’s conservationFunctional diversityMetabolismPigs’ microbiota

Identifiers

PMID34296337
PMCPMC8390420
OpenAlexW3186856058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.