Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34296334›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Process, content, and experiences of delivering the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool Intervention (CSNAT-I) in the Danish specialised palliative care setting.

Line Lund, Lone Ross, Morten Aagaard Petersen, Elizabeth Rosted, Georg Bollig, Gitte Irene Juhl, Hanne Farholt, Helen Winther, Louise Laursen, Elin Gundelund Blaaberg and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03466580 (Testing a Caregiver-led Intervention to Improve Support to Caregivers of Patients in Specialized Palliative Care at Home), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03466580 nacompletednot on this map

Testing a Caregiver-led Intervention to Improve Support to Caregivers of Patients in Specialized Palliative Care at Home: a Stepped Wedge (Cluster) Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBispebjerg HospitalRan2018 to 2019Enrolled466ConditionsPalliative CareArmsThe Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. What individual needs do family caregivers have in palliative home care and how are they supported? A qualitative study of a supportive intervention.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Line LundPalliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark. line.lund.01@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5338-9644
Lone RossPalliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark.
Morten Aagaard PetersenPalliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark.
Elizabeth RostedDepartment of Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Georg BolligPalliative Care Team, Medical Department Soenderborg/Toender, South Jutland Hospital, Soenderborg, Denmark.
Gitte Irene JuhlPalliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology and Palliative Care, North Zealand Hospital, Frederikssund, Denmark.
Hanne FarholtDepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helen WintherPalliative Care Unit, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Louise LaursenDepartment of Palliative Care, Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Elin Gundelund BlaabergDiakonissestiftelsens Hospice, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Signe WeensgaardArresoedal Hospice, Frederiksvaerk, Denmark.
Mai-Britt GuldinPalliative Care Team, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Gail EwingCentre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Gunn GrandeSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Mogens GroenvoldPalliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark.

Funding

The A.P. Moeller and Chastine Mc-Kinney Moeller Foundation 11692The Danish Cancer Society A8861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool Intervention (CSNAT-I) has shown positive effects in the Danish specialised palliative care (SPC) setting. Here, we explore the process, content, and experiences of delivering the CSNAT-I.

methodsData were collected during a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial investigating the impact of the CSNAT-I in the Danish SPC setting in 2018-2019. Data were obtained from the CSNAT (tool) completed by caregivers, from health care professionals' (HCPs') written documentation of the CSNAT-I, and from semi-structured interviews with HCPs.

resultsThe study population consisted of the 130 caregivers receiving a first CSNAT-I within 13 days of study enrolment, the 93 caregivers receiving a second CSNAT-I 15-27 days after enrolment, and the 44 HCPs delivering the intervention. Top three domains of unmet caregiver support needs reported in the CSNAT-I were: "knowing what to expect in the future," "dealing with feelings and worries," and "understanding the illness." These domains together with "knowing who to contact if concerned" and "talking to the patient about the illness" were also the domains most frequently prioritised for discussion with HCPs. According to HCPs, most often support delivered directly by HCPs themselves during the actual contact (e.g., listening, advice, information) was sufficient. Overall, HCPs experienced the CSNAT-I as constructive and meaningful, and difficulties in delivering the intervention were rarely an issue.

conclusionThe support needs reported by caregivers confirm the relevance of the CSNAT-I. HCPs' overall experiences of the clinical feasibility and relevance of the CSNAT-I were very positive. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03466580. Date of registration: March 1, 2018.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingPalliative CareCaregiversDenmarkHumansNeeds AssessmentCaregiversInterventionPalliative careProcess evaluationSupport needs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.