Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34296330›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021

Airborne fungi in Universiti Sains Malaysia: knowledge, density and diversity.

Tham Khai Xin, Nur Munira Azman, R B Radin Firdaus, Nor Azliza Ismail, Hafizi Rosli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tham Khai XinSchool of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Nur Munira AzmanSchool of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
R B Radin FirdausSchool of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7022-0576
Nor Azliza IsmailFaculty of Applied Science, Universiti Teknologi MARA Pahang, Jengka Campus, Pahang, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0995-6223
Hafizi RosliSchool of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia. hafizirosli@usm.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2553-9681
Universiti Sains Malaysia · MYUniversiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Airborne fungi are among common contaminants in indoor and outdoor environments, leading to poor indoor air quality (IAQ), and to some extent, implicate health risks to humans worldwide. In Malaysia, fungal contamination in institutional buildings is rarely documented although these places are frequently visited by many. This study was conducted to assess the density and diversity of airborne fungi in Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) main campus, Penang. A total of 11 sampling sites were assessed. Fungi were collected by using Andersen Single Stage Impact Air Sampler N-6 and MEA plates. Two separate trials, namely Trial 1 and Trial 2, were conducted in 2008 and 2019, respectively. The recovered fungi were identified up to the genus level-based morphological features. A survey involving 400 respondents among USM staff and students in relation to fungal contamination in indoor air environment was also conducted to evaluate the knowledge on indoor fungi among USM community. The densities of indoor air fungi in Trial 1 were higher; ranging from 81 to 1743 CFU/m

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyAir Pollution, IndoorEnvironmental MonitoringFungiHumansMalaysiaAllergensAwarenessFungal diversityIndoor air qualityMalaysia

Identifiers

PMID34296330
OpenAlexW3184472026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.