Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34296211›Full record

ArticleAnnals of LGBTQ public and population health2020

Sociocultural influences on attitudes towards pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), history of PrEP use, and future PrEP use in HIV-vulnerable cisgender men who have sex with men across the U.S.

Drew A Westmoreland, Viraj V Patel, Alexa B D'Angelo, Denis Nash, Christian Grov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of LGBTQ public and population health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Adherence Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Drew A WestmorelandCUNY Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, New York, New York, USA.
Viraj V PatelDivision of General Internal Medicine, Montefiore Health System, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Alexa B D'AngeloCUNY Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, New York, New York, USA.
Denis NashCUNY Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, New York, New York, USA.
Christian GrovCUNY Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

Patient and Population Health Outcomes Research SWGP30AI124414 · NIAID · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI Kathryn M. Anastos · 2017 to 2026
$28.3M
Following a U.S. National Cohort of Vulnerable Men to Improve HIV Prevention and CareUH3AI133675 · NIAID · GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH POLICY · PI GROV, CHRISTIAN · 2019 to 2021
$6.9M
Following a U.S. National Cohort of Vulnerable Men to Improve HIV Prevention and CareUG3AI133675 · NIAID · GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH POLICY · PI GROV, CHRISTIAN · 2017 to 2018
$2.6M
Social Media Based Peer Led Intervention to Facilitate PrEP in YMSM of ColorK23MH102118 · NIMH · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI PATEL, VIRAJ V · 2014 to 2018
$953k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI124414NIAID NIH HHS UG3 AI133675NIAID NIH HHS UH3 AI133675NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH102118NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH117751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite its proven effectiveness in reducing HIV transmission, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use remains low. This study used data from a 2017-2018 U.S. national cohort to investigate social influences on PrEP experience and future PrEP use among cisgender men who have sex with men. We used descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic analyses to examine social influences (e.g., how participants heard about PrEP and number of persons they knew taking PrEP) associated with each previous PrEP use and intentions to use PrEP. Among participants who knew of PrEP, commonly reported ways of first hearing about PrEP were through social media (27.4%) and friends (26.8%). These were also cited top influences on participants' current attitudes toward PrEP (friends 23.5%, social media 22.1%). Multivariable logistic regression analyses found that knowing more people taking PrEP was associated with increased odds of previously using PrEP and intending to use PrEP. Friends and social media were common and influential sources of information regarding PrEP. Results suggest that tapping into these social connections may effectively disseminate public health messaging about PrEP and encourage use among key populations to reduce HIV burden.

Indexed as

gender minoritiesHIVPrEPsexual minoritiessocial mediasocial networks

Identifiers

PMID34296211
PMCPMC8294708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.