ArticleCerebral cortex communications2021
The Same Ultra-Rapid Parallel Brain Dynamics Underpin the Production and Perception of Speech.
Article in Cerebral cortex communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal dynamics of lexical and morphosyntactic planning during language production revealed by magnetoencephalography.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Speech onset time at home or in the lab: The role of testing environment and experimenter presence.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Embodied Speech: Sensorimotor Contributions to Native and Non-Native Phoneme Processing and Learning.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Review
- The Time Course of Phonological Encoding: Insights from Time-Resolved MVPA.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Shared phonological networks in frontal and temporal cortex for language production and comprehension.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Language Production and Prediction in a Parallel Activation Model.Topics in cognitive science · 2025Review
- Article
- Frequency-specific cortico-subcortical interaction in continuous speaking and listening.eLife · 2024Article
- Picture naming test through the prism of cognitive neuroscience and linguistics: adapting the test for cerebellar tumor survivors-or pouring new wine in old sacks?Frontiers in psychology · 2024Review
- Cortico-Cerebellar Monitoring of Speech Sequence Production.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Predictive language processing: integrating comprehension and production, and what atypical populations can tell us.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Review
- Spatiotemporal dynamics characterise spectral connectivity profiles of continuous speaking and listening.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- Precision fMRI reveals that the language-selective network supports both phrase-structure building and lexical access during language production.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- A deep hierarchy of predictions enables online meaning extraction in a computational model of human speech comprehension.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- Cerebellar and Cortical Correlates of Internal and External Speech Error Monitoring.Cerebral cortex communications · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The temporal dynamics by which linguistic information becomes available is one of the key properties to understand how language is organized in the brain. An unresolved debate between different brain language models is whether words, the building blocks of language, are activated in a sequential or parallel manner. In this study, we approached this issue from a novel perspective by directly comparing the time course of word component activation in speech production versus perception. In an overt object naming task and a passive listening task, we analyzed with mixed linear models at the single-trial level the event-related brain potentials elicited by the same lexico-semantic and phonological word knowledge in the two language modalities. Results revealed that both word components manifested simultaneously as early as 75 ms after stimulus onset in production and perception; differences between the language modalities only became apparent after 300 ms of processing. The data provide evidence for ultra-rapid parallel dynamics of language processing and are interpreted within a neural assembly framework where words recruit the same integrated cell assemblies across production and perception. These word assemblies ignite early on in parallel and only later on reverberate in a behavior-specific manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.