Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34296173›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex communications2021

Automatic Processing of Numerosity in Human Neocortex Evidenced by Occipital and Parietal Neuromagnetic Responses.

Amandine Van Rinsveld, Vincent Wens, Mathieu Guillaume, Anthony Beuel, Wim Gevers, Xavier De Tiège, Alain Content

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amandine Van RinsveldCenter for Research in Cognition and Neurosciences (CRCN), UNI - ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1050, Belgium.
Vincent WensLaboratoire de Cartographie fonctionnelle du Cerveau (LCFC), UNI - ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1070, Belgium.
Mathieu GuillaumeCenter for Research in Cognition and Neurosciences (CRCN), UNI - ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1050, Belgium.
Anthony BeuelCenter for Research in Cognition and Neurosciences (CRCN), UNI - ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1050, Belgium.
Wim GeversCenter for Research in Cognition and Neurosciences (CRCN), UNI - ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1050, Belgium.
Xavier De TiègeLaboratoire de Cartographie fonctionnelle du Cerveau (LCFC), UNI - ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1070, Belgium.
Alain ContentCenter for Research in Cognition and Neurosciences (CRCN), UNI - ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels 1050, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and other animal species are endowed with the ability to sense, represent, and mentally manipulate the number of items in a set without needing to count them. One central hypothesis is that this ability relies on an automated functional system dedicated to numerosity, the perception of the discrete numerical magnitude of a set of items. This system has classically been associated with intraparietal regions, however accumulating evidence in favor of an early visual number sense calls into question the functional role of parietal regions in numerosity processing. Targeting specifically numerosity among other visual features in the earliest stages of processing requires high temporal and spatial resolution. We used frequency-tagged magnetoencephalography to investigate the early automatic processing of numerical magnitudes and measured the steady-state brain responses specifically evoked by numerical and other visual changes in the visual scene. The neuromagnetic responses showed implicit discrimination of numerosity, total occupied area, and convex hull. The source reconstruction corresponding to the implicit discrimination responses showed common and separate sources along the ventral and dorsal visual pathways. Occipital sources attested the perceptual salience of numerosity similarly to both other implicitly discriminable visual features. Crucially, we found parietal responses uniquely associated with numerosity discrimination, showing automatic processing of numerosity in the parietal cortex, even when not relevant to the task. Taken together, these results provide further insights into the functional roles of parietal and occipital regions in numerosity encoding along the visual hierarchy.

Indexed as

approximate number sensefrequency-taggingmagnetoencephalographynumerosity

Identifiers

PMID34296173
PMCPMC8152830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.