ArticleCerebral cortex communications2020
Context-Dependent Modulation of Corticomuscular Coherence in a Series of Motor Initiation and Maintenance of Voluntary Contractions.
Article in Cerebral cortex communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Volitional modulation of beta-band EMG coherence through frequency-specific neurofeedback.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Alpha and Beta Corticomotor Phase Dynamics Shape Visuomotor Control on a Single-Trial Basis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Global synchronization of functional corticomuscular coupling under precise grip tasks using multichannel EEG and EMG signals.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- The neuromechanical of Beta-band corticomuscular coupling within the human motor system.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Feature stability and setup minimization for EEG-EMG-enabled monitoring systems.EURASIP journal on advances in signal processing · 2022Article
- Gymnasts' Ability to Modulate Sensorimotor Rhythms During Kinesthetic Motor Imagery of Sports Non-specific Movements Superior to Non-gymnasts.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For our precise motor control, we should consider "motor context," which involves the flow from feedforward to feedback control. The present study focused on corticomuscular coherence (CMC) to physiologically evaluate how the sensorimotor integration is modulated in a series of movements depending on the motor context. We evaluated CMC between electroencephalograms over the sensorimotor cortex and rectified electromyograms from the tibialis anterior muscle during intermittent contractions with 2 contraction intensities in 4 experiments. Although sustained contractions with weak-to-moderate intensities led to no difference in CMC between intensities, intermittent ballistic-and-hold contractions with 2 intensities (10% and 15% or 25% of the maximal voluntary contraction, MVC) presented in a randomized order resulted in greater magnitude of CMC for the weaker intensity. Moreover, the relative amount of initial error was larger for trials with 10% of MVC, which indicated that initial motor output was inaccurate during weaker contractions. However, this significant difference in CMC vanished in the absence of trial randomization or the application of intermittent ramp-and-hold contractions with slower torque developments. Overall, CMC appears to be modulated context-dependently and is especially enhanced when active sensorimotor integration is required in feedback control periods because of the complexity and inaccuracy of preceding motor control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.