Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34296093›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex communications2020

Individual Cortical Entropy Profile: Test-Retest Reliability, Predictive Power for Cognitive Ability, and Neuroanatomical Foundation.

Mianxin Liu, Xinyang Liu, Andrea Hildebrandt, Changsong Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Segregation, integration, and balance of large-scale resting brain networks configure different cognitive abilities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Entropy and the Brain: An Overview.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mianxin LiuDepartment of Physics, Centre for Nonlinear Studies and Beijing-Hong Kong-Singapore Joint Centre for Nonlinear and Complex Systems (Hong Kong), Institute of Computational and Theoretical Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
Xinyang LiuDepartment of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.
Andrea HildebrandtDepartment of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.
Changsong ZhouDepartment of Physics, Centre for Nonlinear Studies and Beijing-Hong Kong-Singapore Joint Centre for Nonlinear and Complex Systems (Hong Kong), Institute of Computational and Theoretical Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-4130-0216

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The entropy profiles of cortical activity have become novel perspectives to investigate individual differences in behavior. However, previous studies have neglected foundational aspects of individual entropy profiles, that is, the test-retest reliability, the predictive power for cognitive ability in out-of-sample data, and the underlying neuroanatomical basis. We explored these issues in a large young healthy adult dataset (Human Connectome Project,

Indexed as

brain signal entropycognitive ability predictionindividual differencesneuroanatomical basistest–retest reliability

Identifiers

PMID34296093
PMCPMC8153045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.