Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34296048›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in biomedical engineering2020

Biomaterial strategies for creating

Manoj K Gottipati, Jonathan M Zuidema, Ryan J Gilbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in biomedical engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An Overview of Multiple Sclerosis In Vitro Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clickable Biomaterials for Modulating Neuroinflammation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manoj K GottipatiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 8 Street, Troy, NY. 12180.
Jonathan M ZuidemaDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA. 92093.
Ryan J GilbertDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 8 Street, Troy, NY. 12180.

Funding

Enhanced Neuroprotection Following Acute SCI Using Fibrous MaterialsR01NS092754 · NINDS · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI GILBERT, RYAN J. · 2015 to 2019
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astrocytes are dynamic cells residing in the central nervous system exhibiting many diverse functions. Astrocytes quickly change and present unique phenotypes in response to injury or disease. Here, we briefly summarize recent information regarding astrocyte morphology and function and provide brief insight into their phenotypic changes following injury or disease. We also present the utility of

Identifiers

PMID34296048
PMCPMC8294108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.