ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Hormone Receptor Status May Impact the Survival Benefit Between Medullary Breast Carcinoma and Atypical Medullary Carcinoma of the Breast: A Population-Based Study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Survival outcomes by molecular subtypes based on receptor status in medullary breast carcinoma: a SEER database analysis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- A population-based analysis of a risk stratification system for predicting radiotherapy benefits in invasive breast carcinoma of no special type with medullary pattern.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Clinicopathological observation and prognostic factors of invasive breast cancer with medullary in Xinjiang.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- A risk stratification model to predict chemotherapy benefit in medullary carcinoma of the breast: a population-based SEER database.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA rare subtype of breast cancer, atypical medullary carcinoma of the breast (AMCB), shows a highly adverse prognosis compared to medullary carcinoma of the breast (MBC). The current study aimed to establish a correlated nomogram for the identification of the prognostic factors of AMCB and MBC.
methodsKaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were applied to data acquired from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database for 2004 to 2013 to analyse tumour characteristics and overall survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to determine the overall survival (OS) among those with AMCB and MBC. A predictive nomogram was created, and the concordance index (C-index) was used to predict accuracy and discriminative ability.
resultsA total of 2,001 patients from the SEER database were diagnosed with MBC between 2004 and 2013, including 147 patients diagnosed with AMCB. The number of diagnoses gradually increased in both groups. Cox analysis of multivariate and Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that older age (HR = 3.005, 95% CI 1.906-4.739) and later stage were significantly associated with poor prognosis, while cancer-directed surgery was an independent protective factor (HR = 0.252, 95% CI 0.086-0.740). In the HR-negative stratification analysis, older age (HR = 2.476, 95% CI 1.398-4.385), later stage and histological type (HR=0.381, 95% CI 0.198-0.734) were found to be independent prognostic factors for low standard survival. The log-rank analysis demonstrated significantly worse prognostic factors for patients with AMCB than for those with MBC (
conclusionsMBC is rare, and cancer-directed surgery, older age, and later stage are independently linked with prognosis. In the HR negative population, AMCB patients show a worse survival gain than those with MBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.