Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34295804›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Development and Validation of a Radiomic Nomogram for Predicting the Prognosis of Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma.

Ruizhi Gao, Hui Qin, Peng Lin, Chenjun Ma, Chengyang Li, Rong Wen, Jing Huang, Da Wan, Dongyue Wen, Yiqiong Liang and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ruizhi GaoDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Hui QinDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Peng LinDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Chenjun MaDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Chengyang LiDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Rong WenDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Jing HuangDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Da WanDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Dongyue WenDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Yiqiong LiangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Jiang HuangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Xin LiGE Healthcare Global Research, GE, Shanghai, China.
Xinrong WangGE Healthcare Global Research, GE, Shanghai, China.
Gang ChenDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Yun HeDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Hong YangDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University · CNGuangxi Medical University · CNUnited Imaging Healthcare (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe present study aims to comprehensively investigate the prognostic value of a radiomic nomogram that integrates contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) radiomic signature and clinicopathological parameters in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC).

methodsA total of 136 and 78 KIRC patients from the training and validation cohorts were included in the retrospective study. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess reproducibility of radiomic feature extraction. Univariate Cox analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) as well as multivariate Cox analysis were utilized to construct radiomic signature and clinical signature in the training cohort. A prognostic nomogram was established containing a radiomic signature and clinicopathological parameters by using a multivariate Cox analysis. The predictive ability of the nomogram [relative operating characteristic curve (ROC), concordance index (C-index), Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and calibration curve] was evaluated in the training cohort and validated in the validation cohort. Patients were split into high- and low-risk groups, and the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was conducted to identify the forecasting ability of the established models. In addition, genes related with the radiomic risk score were determined by weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) and were used to conduct functional analysis.

resultsA total of 2,944 radiomic features were acquired from the tumor volumes of interest (VOIs) of CECT images. The radiomic signature, including ten selected features, and the clinical signature, including three selected clinical variables, showed good performance in the training and validation cohorts [area under the curve (AUC), 0.897 and 0.712 for the radiomic signature; 0.827 and 0.822 for the clinical signature, respectively]. The radiomic prognostic nomogram showed favorable performance and calibration in the training cohort (AUC, 0.896, C-index, 0.846), which was verified in the validation cohort (AUC, 0.768). KM curves indicated that the progression-free interval (PFI) time was dramatically shorter in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group. The functional analysis indicated that radiomic signature was significantly associated with T cell activation.

conclusionsThe nomogram combined with CECT radiomic and clinicopathological signatures exhibits excellent power in predicting the PFI of KIRC patients, which may aid in clinical management and prognostic evaluation of cancer patients.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecontrast-enhanced computed tomographykidney renal clear cell carcinomaprognosisweighted correlation network analysis

Identifiers

PMID34295804
PMCPMC8290524
OpenAlexW3181619785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.