Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34295771›Full record

ArticleTranslational pediatrics2021

Persistent fifth aortic arch: a single-center experience, case series.

Yuanyuan Liu, Hui Zhang, Jun Ren, Aimei Cao, Jinghui Guo, Bo Liu, Min Bao, Chunhua Zheng

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. V Aortic Arch Remnant.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuanyuan LiuDivision of Cardiology, the Affiliated Children's Hospital of Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Hui ZhangDivision of Cardiac Surgery, the Affiliated Children's Hospital of Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Jun RenDivision of Cardiology, the Affiliated Children's Hospital of Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Aimei CaoDivision of Cardiology, the Affiliated Children's Hospital of Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Jinghui GuoDivision of Cardiology, the Affiliated Children's Hospital of Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Bo LiuDivision of Cardiology, the Affiliated Children's Hospital of Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Min BaoDivision of Cardiology, the Affiliated Children's Hospital of Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Chunhua ZhengDivision of Cardiology, the Affiliated Children's Hospital of Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Children's Hospital of Capital Institute of Pediatrics · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent fifth aortic arch (PFAA) is an extremely rare congenital cardiovascular malformation and there is limited data in the literature. The objective of this study is to enhance our understanding and diagnosis of PFAA from echocardiography and computed tomography angiography (CTA) findings, and to evaluate the application of echocardiography in the diagnosis of PFAA.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed five cases of PFAA diagnosed from October 2016 to September 2019 at the Affiliated Children's Hospital of Capital Institute of Pediatrics. We described their diagnosis by echocardiography and CTA findings, and medical history.

resultsFive cases of PFAA were identified in the study. Patients aged from 3 to 48 months and weighed from 4 to 12 kg presented different clinical symptoms upon clinical examination. All the patients completed a primary echocardiographic assessment; however, the first two patients were misdiagnosed by echocardiography and was confirmed by supplemental CTA while the other three patients were directly diagnosed by echocardiography. Surgery was necessary for three patients, two of whom accepted and one refused. The other two patients only needed a follow-up assessment, which showed good results.

conclusionsThe clinical manifestation of PFAA in our patient population was atypical, and their diagnosis depended on the use of echocardiography. In the case of uncertainty, the final diagnosis was confirmed by CTA. Although the nomenclature and embryonic origin of PFAA remains controversial, the accurate diagnosis of aortic arch abnormalities and associated malformations are imperative for time-sensitive treatments.

Indexed as

case seriescomputed tomography angiography (CTA)echocardiographyPersistent fifth aortic arch (PFAA)surgery

Identifiers

PMID34295771
PMCPMC8261588
OpenAlexW3169722830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.