ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2021
Active surveillance for prostate cancer.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Active Surveillance in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer, the Potential Role of Biomarkers: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Pooled it
- Thinking, Feeling, Choosing: How Affect Is Reflected in Prostate Cancer Treatment Decision Making-A Qualitative Study.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- Multicenter Validation of a Risk Classification Cluster for Unfavorable Pathology in Prostatectomy Specimens of Patients with an Active Surveillance Expanded Inclusion Criteria.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Lack of real-world evidence on active surveillance in Chinese patients with prostate cancer: insights from a 10-year cohort and a physician survey.BMC urology · 2026Observational
- Article
- Quality of life in low-risk prostate cancer under active surveillance or following radical treatments: the START cohort study.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
- Predictive models for biopsy upgrading in active surveillance for prostate cancer: a scoping review.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- The interplay and influence of anxiety and depression among men with early-stage prostate cancer and their close allies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- Standardizing Prostate MRI Reporting in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: The PRECISE Framework.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025Review
- Prostate cancer screening.Asian journal of urology · 2025Review
- Key Determinants Influencing Treatment Decision-Making for and Adherence to Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Comparing Multigene Molecular Testing Results of MRI-Target Versus Systematic Prostate Needle Biopsies of Candidates for and Under Active Surveillance.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Molecular profiling of basal cell carcinoma of the prostate: A case report and literature review.Urology case reports · 2025Article
- PRIMARY scoring in 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: correlation with prostate cancer risk groups and its potential impact on active surveillance.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Reclassification of prostate cancer on first confirmatory prostate biopsy in men under active surveillance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Central European journal of urology · 2025Review
- Prostate MRI and artificial intelligence during active surveillance: should we jump on the bandwagon?European radiology · 2024Review
- Erectile dysfunction associated with prostate cancer treatment and therapeutic advances: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Genomics in active surveillance and post-prostatectomy patients: A review of when and how to use effectively.Current urology reports · 2024Review
- Cognitive Targeted Prostate Biopsy Alone for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Selected Biopsy-Naïve Patients: Results from a Retrospective Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Many men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer can postpone definitive treatment without raising their risk of metastasis or death from disease. Active surveillance (AS) is a method of monitoring select men, with the option of switching to active treatment upon signs of progression, thereby avoiding the well-known side-effects of surgery and radiotherapy. This review analyzes the data from long-running AS cohorts to determine the safety and efficacy of AS. We conducted a narrative review of recently published data, including 14 articles from 13 AS cohorts. The cohorts used varying inclusion criteria, with reported differences in clinical T stage and Gleason Score (Grade Group), among other features. Some studies (n=5) limited their cohorts to low-risk patients, while others (n=8) also included intermediate-risk patients. The heterogeneity of the cohorts produced mixed results, with the risk of prostate cancer metastasis ranging from 0.1-1.0% at 10 years and the risk of prostate cancer mortality ranging from 0-1.9% at 10 years. However, the majority of studies reported risks of less than 0.5% at 10 years for both metastasis and death. For most cohorts, half of men remained untreated for 5-10 years, with estimates ranging from 37% receiving active treatment in the Toronto cohort to 73% in the Prostate Cancer Research International AS (PRIAS) study. Current data do not support the use of negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to avoid scheduled biopsy. Taken together, the data collected from these AS cohorts suggests that AS is a safe approach for men with low-grade prostate cancer and some men with intermediate risk disease. AS should be more broadly implemented for eligible patients to avoid the decreases in quality of life from undergoing active treatment. Studies expanding the inclusion criteria and further defining a subset of men with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer who might safely benefit from AS are needed to assess the long-term outcomes of using AS in intermediate-risk groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.