ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2021
Penile schwannoma mistaken for hemangioma: a rare case report and literature review.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidental discovery of a penile schwannoma during varicocelectomy: A rare case report.Urology case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Case report and literature review: plexiform schwannoma in the penile and inguinal region in a child.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Excision of recurrent penile schwannoma with neurovascular bundle sparing: A novel surgical approach.Urology case reports · 2023Article
- Multiple penile schwannomas.Urology case reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penile neoplasm is uncommon. Schwannomas of the penis are especially rare. For this reason, it is difficult to get an accurate impression to enable decision making. This report primarily deals with the mistaken diagnosis of hemangioma, to the surgery, and the follow-up in real-world. A 38-year-old male patient presented with a palpable mass in the penile root that increased in size with erection. One year after the mass had been found, the patient visited the hospital and complained that the mass was growing. Moreover, the patient explained that the mass seemed to increase during penile erection. On physical examinations, a 2 cm mass without tenderness was palpated in the left penoscrotal junction. About 2.1 cm in size, an isoechoic mass was observed next to the corpus cavernosum on ultrasonography. There was high vascularity inside of the mass. Excision and biopsy were decided upon. Following surgery, a schwannoma was confirmed by pathology. After three months, the patient did not complain of any symptoms and had normal erectile function. Most of these tumors are benign. By December 2020, 40 cases were reported, of which 6 were diagnosed as malignant. The most frequent occurrence site is the penile shaft. In all cases, surgical resection was performed and no recurrence was found. The aim of this case report is to assist clinicians in choosing the best treatment option when faced with this rare condition by discussing the radiological, pathological, and clinical course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.