Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34295729›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2021

Secondary neoplasms of the urinary bladder-clinical management and oncological outcomes.

Omar El-Taji, Abdullah Al-Mitwalli, Farhan Malik, Samita Agarwal, Andrew Gogbashian, Rob Hughes, Nikhil Vasdev, Anand Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Treatment and prognosis of multiple primary malignant neoplasms complicated with renal cell carcinoma].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Omar El-TajiDepartment of Urology, Lister Hospital, East and North Herts NHS Trust, Stevenage, SG1 4AB UK.
Abdullah Al-MitwalliDepartment of Urology, Lister Hospital, East and North Herts NHS Trust, Stevenage, SG1 4AB UK.
Farhan MalikImperial College Business School, London, UK.
Samita AgarwalDepartment of Histopathology, Lister Hospital, East and North Herts NHS Trust, Stevenage, SG1 4AB, UK.
Andrew GogbashianDepartment of Radiology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Northwood, HA6 2RN, UK.
Rob HughesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, HA6 2RN, UK.
Nikhil VasdevDepartment of Urology, Lister Hospital, East and North Herts NHS Trust, Stevenage, SG1 4AB UK.
Anand SharmaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, HA6 2RN, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSecondary neoplasms of the bladder account for 4.5% of all bladder neoplasms however there is limited literature reporting management and survival. This is the largest single centre series presented in current literature with long term oncological follow up.

methodsThis is a single institutional, retrospective cohort study of patients with a histological diagnosis of a secondary bladder neoplasm from January 2007 to December 2017 (n=40). Prognostic variables examined included age at diagnosis, histology, disease free survival and treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate survival. We used multiple regression analysis to identify the most significant treatments for each population group in terms of their survival.

resultsTwenty-one patients were male (53%) with a median age of 68 and 19 were female (47%) with a median age of 64. The most common secondary neoplasms and their median survival were prostate [12 patients (30%), 446 days], colorectal [9 patients (23%), 403 days], ovarian [5 patients (13%), 369 days], cervical [4 patients (10%), 148 days], breast [3 patients (8%), 241 days], lymphoma [3 patients (8%), 145 days], gastric [2 patients (5%), 66 days], and renal [2 patients (5%), 854 days]. Those receiving treatment following a secondary diagnosis demonstrated statistical significance in survival for colorectal (surgery P=0.013), prostate (radiotherapy P=0.0012 and hormonal therapy P=0.004) and ovarian cancer (chemotherapy P=0.00002).

conclusionsPrognosis and treatment depends upon the primary neoplasm. There is some survival benefit in well selected patients receiving treatment following a diagnosis of a bladder secondary.

Indexed as

Bladder cancermetastatic cancersecondary neoplasmsurvival

Identifiers

PMID34295729
PMCPMC8261409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.