Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34295651›Full record

ArticleToxicology reports2021

Shunmugiah Mahendran, Pandiaraj Maheswari, Vanaraj Sasikala, Jeba Jaya Rubika, Jeyaraj Pandiarajan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Preservative Effects ofFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  5. Neuroprotective Mechanisms ofMarine drugs · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. From Ocean to Medicine: Harnessing Seaweed's Potential for Drug Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Neuroprotection ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shunmugiah MahendranDepartment of Microbiology, Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College (Autonomous), Sivakasi, Tamil Nadu, India.
Pandiaraj MaheswariDepartment of Microbiology, Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College (Autonomous), Sivakasi, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vanaraj SasikalaDepartment of Microbiology, Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College (Autonomous), Sivakasi, Tamil Nadu, India.
Jeba Jaya RubikaDepartment of Microbiology, Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College (Autonomous), Sivakasi, Tamil Nadu, India.
Jeyaraj PandiarajanDepartment of Biotechnology, Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College (Autonomous), Sivakasi, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, seaweeds drew the intense attention of the researchers owing their biological properties with their multi assorted applications to the humans. Red seaweeds are well-known for their biological activities due to enrichment of phenolic residues. The present investigation deals with the portrayal of biological behavior of red algae G

Indexed as

ABTSAntioxidant activityDPPHFT-IRGC–MSGracilaria edulisHypnea valentiaePolyphenol

Identifiers

PMID34295651
PMCPMC8282983
OpenAlexW3181935370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.