ArticleJournal of acute medicine2021
A Study to Analyze Narrative Feedback Record of an Emergency Department.
Article in Journal of acute medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimising feedback provision and literacy in medical training: linking theory to practice.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Entrustable professional activity use in emergency medicine: A scoping review.AEM education and training · 2025Article
- Quality improvement collaborative for improving patient care delivery in Argentine public health sector intensive care units.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study adopts the Situation-Behavior-Impact-Action (SBIA) model to examine the compliance of narrative feedback in the Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs)-based e-Portfolio system for clinical preceptors in the emergency department of a regional teaching hospital, and analyzes the applicability of its application in emergency clinical training to increase the feasibility of improving the quality of clinical preceptors' feedback content.
methodsApplication of data mining technique to analyze 928 data points was recorded by 14 clinical teachers from April 2017 to May 2019. These data points were narrative feedback from workplace direct observation, which was recorded in the EPAs-based e-Portfolio.
resultsThe majority of the narrative feedback consisted of only one component, behavior observed (53.99%) and action suggestion (17.24%). Some feedback consisted of two to three components; which were behavior observed-action suggestion (20.37%) and situation description-behavior observed- action suggestion (1.29%). Only a few feedbacks consisted of all four components: situation description- behavior observed-possible impact-action suggestion (0.75%).
conclusionsThe current narrative feedback is from the basic appearance of SBIA, but there still got room for improvement. The narrative feedback should be given according to SBIA model in order to provide a comprehensive and constructive learning outcome. The narrative feedback recorded in EPAsbased e-Portfolio provides the delay of feedback effect. Thus, multiple feedbacks from various clinical teachers could make the assessments more concrete and outline the authentic clinical condition of the trainees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.